> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Fedyk
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:16 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom-Asterisk hints
How do you setup asterisk so that the assistant sees the lights but
doesn't hear the rings?
picciuX wrote:
damon, i think many guys here missed your point and went away from it.
What you want to do is possible: i managed to do that using a GXP-2000
with beta firmare and asterisk 1.2.0.
GXP cor
damon, i think many guys here missed your point and went away from it.
What you want to do is possible: i managed to do that using a GXP-2000
with beta firmare and asterisk 1.2.0.
GXP correctly processes the "status change messages" and show a
blinking led for the BLF of a ringing extension. The GX
Oh
sweet.
-Original Message-From: Rob McKrill
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 11:25
AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom-Asterisk
hints/presence
According to the release notes for
According to the release notes for Polycom's SIP 1.6.6 firmware the "Buddy Watch" limitations have been increased from 8 watched buddies to 48 which would give you enough to watch status on three (14 button) side cars.
Haven't tested it but read a discussion in the forum about it and plan to tes
>
> Sean,
>
> Where did you find that quote, I would like to see the rest of the
> thread if there was relevant discussions.
>
> Thanks.
>
It was really a two email thread... I had sent an email asking what the
status of BLA/SCA: Here is the entire thread:
Sean Cook wrote:
> > I take it SCA/B
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:16 -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> The way asterisk works is it abstracts concepts from protocol details.
sorta, it would be better if it actually abstracted everything so that
applications (modules prefixed with app_ generally) dont have to know
much, if anything, about a ch
Damon Estep wrote:
I understand your "technology agnostic position", and it makes sense,
however my vote (for the little that it is worth) would be to implement
a SIP rfc complaint shared line appearance capability (and/or bridged
line appearance), and then, if possible, extend it to support zapt
@suburbanbroadband.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think there was a patch that went in recently from Mark with
regard
> > > to SIP devices and their state when they are ringing/in use and
when
> > > they are just "in use". That may help you with what you're asking
> > > about.
> > >
> >
> > I tested
> >
>
> I think there was a patch that went in recently from Mark with regard
> to SIP devices and their state when they are ringing/in use and when
> they are just "in use". That may help you with what you're asking
> about.
>
Let's assume for a minute that there is a way to get a ringing notif
On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think there was a patch that went in recently from Mark with regard
> to SIP devices and their state when they are ringing/in use and when
> they are just "in use". That may help you with what you're asking
> about.
>
I tested on 1.2.8, wa
> >
> > If your comments echo those of past conversations on the matter I
can
> > see that a bounty at this point would not be money well spent, since
any
> > work the comes from it is not likely to make the cut. A bounty would
> > only be useful to accelerate the implementation of a feature where
>
> I think there was a patch that went in recently from Mark with regard
> to SIP devices and their state when they are ringing/in use and when
> they are just "in use". That may help you with what you're asking
> about.
>
I tested on 1.2.8, was it after the release of 1.2.8?
_
On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changing the subject back to the original topic;
Is there bug in the asterisk hint/presence implementation, or an
intentional omission, or a lack of understanding on my part?
A SIP debug of a subscribed extension shows that asterisk only sends t
On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're right in that there is nothing in technology spec to support
> the concept of shared line appearance, but I think what was more to my
> point was that you could get access to a "shared line" from more
> channels than just a SIP channe
Changing the subject back to the original topic;
Is there bug in the asterisk hint/presence implementation, or an
intentional omission, or a lack of understanding on my part?
A SIP debug of a subscribed extension shows that asterisk only sends the
SIP presence notification to the subscriber when
> >
>
> From Kevin Flemming at Digium:
>
> It will most definitely not be in 1.4, but I
> would expect it to appear some time early in the next development
cycle
> and be part of Asterisk 1.6.
>
>
Sean,
Where did you find that quote, I would like to see the rest of the
thread if there was rel
>
> You're right in that there is nothing in technology spec to support
> the concept of shared line appearance, but I think what was more to my
> point was that you could get access to a "shared line" from more
> channels than just a SIP channel. I'd probably want the ability to
> have two SIP
On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Bob,
> >
> > We have also done some similar stuff to make it usable, the prospect
> > that we might be able to achieve the same functionality and add to
it as
> > a bonus the ability
> On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Bob,
> >
> > We have also done some similar stuff to make it usable, the prospect
> > that we might be able to achieve the same functionality and add to
it as
> > a bonus the ability to monitor the boss's extension state (idle, on
the
I would think the biggest issue with this at this point is because
Asterisk is not a SIP only platform, if one were to implement shared
line appearance, it would need to be designed in such a way that
channels other than SIP channels could participate in the "sharing" of
lines.
It has been tal
On 6/1/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Bob,
We have also done some similar stuff to make it usable, the prospect
that we might be able to achieve the same functionality and add to it as
a bonus the ability to monitor the boss's extension state (idle, on the
phone, away) with th
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Amen
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom-Asterisk hints/presence
Damon Estep wrote:
>
> My goal was to have someone's assistant see
Damon Estep wrote:
My goal was to have someone’s assistant see that the boss’s line was
ringing and be able to pick it up. I assumed I would have to use the
callgroup/pickupgroup to do so, although was optimistic that that the
call pickup could be programmed into the line watching button duri
I
believe, that to be able to pick up a ringing line, you need to use shared
appearances, and 'seize' the line. The polycom phones support it, but Asterisk
does not yet.
-Original Message-From: Damon Estep
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006
8:21 AMTo: Aste
Hello,
Try both asterisk and ser for IM/presence .
--- Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> I set up hints and presence monitoring on some
> Polycom phones connected
> to an asterisk server with the expectation that the
> phones that are
> "watching" other extensions would be notified whe
26 matches
Mail list logo
