Re: [Asterisk-Users] agi problem

2005-05-03 Thread Moises Silva
Hi Smadi. I have tested the script in my box and seems to be working just fine. By the way, in any programming language, the way to get the asterisk environment vars, and in general all the communication is through STDIN, STDOUT and STDERR try to give us more info so we can help you best regards

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-02 Thread Giovanni Miano
Try print "EXEC ChanIsAvail IAX2/24\n"; Channel type is IAX2 not IAX Cheers 2005/12/2, Cyrille Demaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'm running the last CVS asterisk version (I was running an older version > before with the same problem) and I've a problem with agi scripts. Commands > results

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-02 Thread Cyrille Demaret
écembre 2005 12:52 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem Try print "EXEC ChanIsAvail IAX2/24\n"; Channel type is IAX2 not IAX Cheers 2005/12/2, Cyrille Demaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I'm running the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-02 Thread Giovanni Miano
agi are not correct. > > Regards, > > Cyrille > > -Message d'origine- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giovanni > Miano > Envoyé: vendredi 2 décembre 2005 12:52 > À: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Ob

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-02 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > The first result is ok (-1) but not the second and the third. > Why do I get different results for the same command? Hm... u might want to try this: # Check print "EXEC ChanIsAvail IAX/24\n"; $result = ; print "VERBOSE \"$result\" 0\n"; $result = ; # Check print "EXEC ChanIsAvail IAX/24

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-02 Thread Cyrille Demaret
i 2 décembre 2005 16:18 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem I thing u cant use ChanIsAvail with exec command ... as use EXEC DIAL(SIP/40) .. it isnt work 2005/12/2, Cyrille Demaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-12-05 Thread Giovanni Miano
; Cyrille >> -Message d'origine-> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] De la part de Giovanni> Miano> Envoyé: vendredi 2 décembre 2005 12:52> À: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion> Objet: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI Problem

2005-10-17 Thread Obelix
Quoting "René Enskat [Teamware GmbH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: In my experience most AGI problems I had came from other info sent to the terminal via verbose commands and other stdout output. There is some info on the voip-info wiki about using AGI. I use the phpagi 2 library, and carefully setting u

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-23 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mehmet Avcioglu Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:02 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem Hello, I have an AGI script t

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-23 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: > Just a WAG - 4 is the error level returned by your php script, where it > normally returns 0. Yes would thing so. But at no place in my script I intentionally exit with 4. I believe 4 is SIGILL (Illegal Instruction) so my script might be seg f

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-23 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 09/23/2011 12:16 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Just a WAG - 4 is the error level returned by your php script, where it normally returns 0. Yes would thing so. But at no place in my script I intentionally exit with 4. I believe 4 is SIGILL (I

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > I have an AGI script that occasionally disappears without completing its > action and asterisk logs the following. > > AGI Script script.php completed, returning 4 > Spawn extension (context, 0123456, 2) exited non-zero on > 'Local/0123456

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Sam Govind
How much time your AGI is taking? Check if it is completing its task and not killed by asterisk. I guess we've 6~7 seconds before asterisk kills all call channel and related tasks. On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > >

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
Thanks for the response. Asterisk logs the execution of the AGI and script completed messages within the same second, so less than a second. -- Mehmet On Sep 24, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Sam Govind wrote: > How much time your AGI is taking? Check if it is completing its task and not > killed by as

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Sam Govind
Thats wicked !! hmmm stop your asterisk (if u can afford) and run it like "asterisk -cvg" and then make a call.. see whats your AGI doing in there !! On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > > Thanks for the response. > > Asterisk logs the execution of the AGI and script comp

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
Out of about 18000 instances this problem occurred 48 times yesterday. So it has been pretty much impossible for me to replicate it under test conditions. Thanks -- Mehmet On Sep 24, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Sam Govind wrote: > Thats wicked !! hmmm stop your asterisk (if u can afford) and run it lik

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Sam Govind
Should we consider it ignorable or you are still interested in resolving ! Best of Luck in any case ! On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > > Out of about 18000 instances this problem occurred 48 times yesterday. So > it has been pretty much impossible for me to replicate it u

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
Thanks for the help. 48 times out of 18000 should be ignorable in most cases but it required human intervention 48 times.:) Obviously if there is no other way I'll find a way to automate that human intervention somehow.. Thanks again. -- Mehmet On Sep 24, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Sam Govind wrote: >

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-24 Thread Steve Edwards
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: Thanks for the help. 48 times out of 18000 should be ignorable in most cases but it required human intervention 48 times.:) Obviously if there is no other way I'll find a way to automate that human intervention somehow.. Thanks again. In no particu

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-26 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
Thanks for the response. Although I had already gone thorough a lot of these types of QAs during my own problem solving, your suggestions did bring a couple that I had not. > In no particular order... > > Earlier, you suspected receiving a signal was causing your problem. > Instead of ignoring

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-26 Thread Danny Nicholas
ssage- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mehmet Avcioglu Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 7:08 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem Thanks for the respo

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-26 Thread Steve Edwards
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Steve Edwards wrote: Instead of ignoring the signal, how setting up a handler and logging the reception? On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: The program is written in a very top to bottom way (himm stateless? non-oo? not sure what to call it) and would be really

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-27 Thread Mehmet Avcioglu
Danny's suggestion of using System instead of AGI was correct, it was wrong of me to use AGI here as there is no communication. The same script does communicate with asterisk when executed with different options, so I had just kept the same line using different options at different places. To

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI Problem

2011-09-27 Thread Steve Edwards
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: Today I changed the AGI calls to System at places where there is no response back to asterisk. Kept everything the same, instead of AGI(script.php,var1,var2) made it System(/path/script.php "var1" "var2") and it worked without a problem. This way I h

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash)

2003-10-16 Thread Nicolas Gudino
Hi, I have the same problem, Im also running RH 9. But Im using SIP only with Cisco ATAs. There are reports of asterisk not doing well with RedHat because of the new threads handling in RH kernel. Maybe compiling a fresh rpm from kernel.org will solve the problem. Testing my AGI script (writen in

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9

2003-10-17 Thread Nicolas Gudino
Hi Ivar, Try putting this line before launching asterisk: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 Best regards, On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 06:48, Ívar Ragnarsson wrote: > Hi > > Every time I hangup on my AGI script Asterisk crashes if it is not running > in console mode. > (happens when using python and per

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9

2003-10-17 Thread Ray Burkholder
ED] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9 > > > Hi Ivar, > > Try putting this line before launching asterisk: > > export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 > > Best regards, > > On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 06:48, Ívar Ragnarsson wrote: > > Hi >

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9

2003-10-17 Thread mattf
other languages too MATT--- -Original Message- From: Ray Burkholder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 5:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9 You may wish to upgrade your kernel to 2.4.20-20.9 through 'up2date&#

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9

2003-10-17 Thread Michael T Farnworth
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, mattf wrote: > Redhat has EVERYTHING set to LANG=UTF-8 and it screws up all sorts of perl > stuff, and several other pre-written programs in other languages too It is a pain, and it even breaks man pages and all sorts of other things in my experience. I recommend disabling

RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9

2003-10-21 Thread Ívar Ragnarsson
ECTED]' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem (crash) in RH9 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, mattf wrote: > Redhat has EVERYTHING set to LANG=UTF-8 and it screws up all sorts of perl > stuff, and several other pre-written programs in other languages too It is a pain, and it even breaks man pages

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-25 Thread Eric Wieling, Asteria Solutions Group
Douglas Mortensen wrote: > > I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an > AGI script. We are having problems getting it to stream files. From what > we can tell, it is talking to asterisk correctly when called from the > dial plan. Its stderr output goes to the asteris

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-25 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Douglas Mortensen wrote: > I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an > AGI script. We are having problems getting it to stream files. From what > we can tell, it is talking to asterisk correctly when called from the > dial plan. Its stderr outp

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-25 Thread Luis Morales
Suggest, Use .net to do an web services and use curl+agi scripts to integrate your solutions. Regards, Luis Morales On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Douglas Mortensen wrote: > Hello. > > I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an > AGI script. We are having proble

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-25 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Steve Edwards wrote: > The AGI interface (is that redundant?) can be summarized as: > > 1) Asterisk sends a bunch of cruft (the AGI environment variables) to your > program's STDIN. 1a) Your program must read all of the AGI environment variables. > 2) Your program sends a re

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-26 Thread Douglas Mortensen
Steve: = Thanks for the info on the agi debug command. We'll see what information we can garner with that. Thanks also for the advanced logging info. Unfortunately, we are pretty aware of how AGI works (at least at the level that you explained it). Thanks for the illustrati

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-26 Thread Douglas Mortensen
An update here. Yesterday's problem has been solved (partly). After looking closer at the results of my perl script, as well as looking at the documentation, I realized that we were leaving the escape character argument off of the STREAM FILE command in the mono application. After appending "" to t

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-02-26 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Douglas Mortensen wrote: > New problem: > == > Although we see the following in our logs / asterisk console: [Feb 26 > 11:11:05] VERBOSE[9824] logger.c: -- Playing 'filename' > (escape_digits=) (sample_offset 0) > > All that the caller hears is a very brief clic

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI problem using mono (.Net)

2009-03-03 Thread Luis Morales
Hi douglas, I made an AGI script with curl in my dial-plan. Take a look: [custom-login] exten => s,1,Set(LOGINOK=0) exten => s,2,Read(codigo|custom/codigo|4||3|3) exten => s,3,Read(clave|custom/clave|4||3|3) exten => s,4,Set(LOGINOK=${CURL(http:///cgi-bin/login.pl?codigo=${codigo}&clave=${clave

Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI problem with library path

2005-09-12 Thread Olivier Perrin
You can add your library path in the /etc/init.d/asterisk script and restart asterisk via service. or You also can 1/ add your library path in your /etc/ld.so.conf 2/ type ldconfig as root. 3/ restart asterisk via service > Hi List, > > My AGI seems work well in