On Thursday 01 December 2011, Hans Witvliet wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:02 +, A J Stiles wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 December 2011, gincantalupo wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
> > >
> > > Thank You.
> > >
> > > Giorgio
> >
> > 1. Migr
Hi Alex,
replace with anything which could make Asterisk connect to Skype
network, make and receive calls, etc...the usual stuff.
Giorgio
On 12/01/2011 02:40 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:30 AM, gincantalupo wrote:
any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
Replace wit
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:02 +, A J Stiles wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2011, gincantalupo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
> > Giorgio
>
> 1. Migrate your Skype users over to a better product which supports proper
> op
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:30 AM, gincantalupo
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
>
> Thank You.
>
> Giorgio
>
We are going through this right now and have chosen to "Pay The Man"
via per channel subscription to Skype Connect.
Watch the fun video at:
http://www.
On Thursday 01 December 2011, gincantalupo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
>
> Thank You.
>
> Giorgio
1. Migrate your Skype users over to a better product which supports proper
open standards.
2. Write to your elected representatives asking that they
On 12/01/2011 08:30 AM, gincantalupo wrote:
any idea about how to replace Skype For Asterisk?
Replace with what?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Dear Abdul Basit,
http://nerdvittles.com/index.php?p=784 works, I tested it few months back
and it works. Cant say if its still working or not.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Abdul Basit wrote:
> Any has Skype For Asterisk (SFA) license.
>
> http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skypefo
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, A J Stiles wrote:
> > You would be better off persuading Skype users to transition to something
> > else.
> Sadly, my experience in the SOHO environment is that Skype wins.
> [stuff deleted]
> And now I'm seeing some of m
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
As SIP endpoints (servers, phones, etc.) get upgraded to support the ICE
> NAT traversal mechanism, this will start happening for regular SIP calls as
> well. This *should* already happen with the Blink softphone, for example,
> since it fu
On 11/16/2011 10:44 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
The other thing - LAN to LAN calls STAY ON THE LAN! So I can "Skype" my
wife next door and it doesn't use up any of my own broadband bandwidth
wheras if I use a hosted SIP service, calls go out & come back in again.
Skype also seems to be able to r
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Skype For Asterisk (SFA)
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, A J Stiles wrote:
> You would be better off persuading Skype users to transition to something
> else.
>
>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, A J Stiles wrote:
You would be better off persuading Skype users to transition to something else.
Skype is the absolute antithesis of the whole point of telephony, which is to
connect people together. This includes, implicitly, the ability for
subscribers on one telecommun
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Abdul Basit wrote:
> Any has Skype For Asterisk (SFA) license.
>
> http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skypeforasterisk.php
>
> PLEASE NOTE: Skype for Asterisk is no longer available for sale. Skype for
> Asterisk will be supported for two more years, until J
I can tell you that siptosis is workable but the support has been dropped
recently as well.
It is a great program and especially the paid version with trunk builder
i.e. you can have multiple skype instances
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Abdul Basit wrote:
> Any has Skype For Asterisk (SFA)
Yes, Skype was a good thing. R.I.P
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Abdul Basit wrote:
> Any has Skype For Asterisk (SFA) license.
>
> http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/skypeforasterisk.php
>
> PLEASE NOTE: Skype for Asterisk is no longer available for sale. Skype for
> Asterisk will be
hi:
thanks for all the information. I don't use skype and I ban skype
at our network. but there are some people who use skype and want us to
use skype to contact them. SFA is my saver because our users can use
their phone to talk with skype users and no need to install any skype
software.
I h
On Tuesday 12 Jul 2011, d tbsky wrote:
> hi:
>I am a SFA (skype for asterisk) user. I had ask Digium questions
> about SFA usage in the future. but they seem too busy to reply. so I
> tried at this list. I hope there are SFA users or Digium people can
> solve my confusion.
Poor you!
To my min
On 07/12/2011 08:26 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> It is unknown whether it will continue to be usable after that period;
> Skype has the ability to disable SFA from accessing the Skype network
> if they feel that is what they want to do. Since it won't get any
> updates between now and then, it i
On 07/11/2011 09:48 PM, d tbsky wrote:
1. SFA can not be registered after 26 July. so I want to prepare a
backup machine for our server. I read in the document that I can
re-register my SFA once. so I want to make sure if I can re-register with
my backup server now, and in the same time my produ
Will you consider alternatives such as siptosis? The uncertainties are really
there for SFA
CK Lee
On 12 Jul, 2011, at 10:48 AM, d tbsky wrote:
> hi:
> I am a SFA (skype for asterisk) user. I had ask Digium questions
> about SFA usage in the future. but they seem too busy to reply. so I
> tr
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, A J Stiles
wrote:
> Bgeh. Serves 'em right for using that POC! Who honestly *hadn't* seen this
> coming since the day Skype was first released?
Tim Panton, who's beenworking with SfA since it came out, posted this
article today:
http://vuc.li/meBRJd
/r
--
_
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, randulo wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Matt Darnell
wrote:
> > "We expect that users of Skype for Asterisk will be able to continue
> > using their Asterisk systems on the Skype network until at least July
> > 26, 2013. Skype may extend this at their discreti
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Matt Darnell wrote:
> "We expect that users of Skype for Asterisk will be able to continue
> using their Asterisk systems on the Skype network until at least July
> 26, 2013. Skype may extend this at their discretion."
It's widely believed. However, it's very pos
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Usage of the standard Skype client is not "free"; it
> involves acting as
> part of the peer-to-peer Skype network
> The Skype
> business solutions (including Skype For Asterisk) don't
> participate in
> the peer-to-peer network
> Any solution t
-
From: Alejandro Imass
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Date: Sunday, July 18 2010 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Skype for Asterisk, Skype For SIP
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Vieri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to integrate Skype and As
On 07/18/2010 12:18 PM, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:56:30AM -0700, Vieri wrote:
>
>>> As I said above, once you have purchased your SIP channel
>>> you can make
>>> free calls to your PBX using the special number but it's
>>> only INBOUND
>>> AFAIK.
> [lots snipped]
>
> With
On 07/18/2010 11:56 AM, Vieri wrote:
> I still don't see why one should pay for a channel when using a PBX but not
> when using a client such as Skype. OK, I know that the Skype network is
> proprietary and I have to accept whatever they say.
Usage of the standard Skype client is not "free"; it
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:56:30AM -0700, Vieri wrote:
> > As I said above, once you have purchased your SIP channel
> > you can make
> > free calls to your PBX using the special number but it's
> > only INBOUND
> > AFAIK.
[lots snipped]
With Skype's just released SkypeKit it should be possible t
--- On Sun, 7/18/10, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to integrate Skype and Asterisk but I'm
> only interested in these 2 things:
> >
> > 1) allow any Asterisk SIP extension to call any Skype
> "user". I do not need to call landlines via Skype.
> >
>
> I think this is _explic
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Vieri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to integrate Skype and Asterisk but I'm only interested in these 2
> things:
>
> 1) allow any Asterisk SIP extension to call any Skype "user". I do not need
> to call landlines via Skype.
>
I think this is _explicitly_ not suppo
Hi!
> I understand that SfA is a binary module? There are processors it will not
> work on, correct? Are there limits as to operating system or distros?
Requires kernel 2.6, does not work on 2.4 - as I had to find out the hard
way (this is not documented - so embedded people: be aware!).
Philip
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:43:59 -0800, vijay.go...@alliance-infotech.com
wrote:
>
>case 2: This skype account (rexesbposolutions) has been assigned with a
>online virtual number (00 44 20 ). If somebody dial this number
>from their landline/cellphone, call is transfered to Asterisk queue bu
Dear,
there is a problem in codec translation..so change the ulaw codec to
g729. .if problem persist then u must have same codex on asterisk server and
clients (skype)...
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Tim Panton wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec 2009, at 19:43, vijay.go...@alliance-infotech.com wr
On 30 Dec 2009, at 19:43, vijay.go...@alliance-infotech.com wrote:
>
> Hi Sir,
>
> We have integrated Skype with Asterisk (skype user id:- rexesbposolutions).
> Each call which is coming to skype account is getting transfered to Asterisk
> Queue. It has following two cases:
>
> case 1: When
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Matt Riddell wrote:
> On 2/09/09 7:45 PM, Remco Barendse wrote:
>> So i create a callfile that looks like this:
>> ---
>> Channel: SIP/228
>> MaxRetries: 0
>> Dial(Skype/asterisk...@somebodyonskype)
>> Priority: 1
>> Callerid: Somebodyonskype
>
> You're combining technologies t
On 2/09/09 7:45 PM, Remco Barendse wrote:
> So i create a callfile that looks like this:
> ---
> Channel: SIP/228
> MaxRetries: 0
> Dial(Skype/asterisk...@somebodyonskype)
> Priority: 1
> Callerid: Somebodyonskype
You're combining technologies there :)
You can do:
Channel
Context
Extension
Prior
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Terry Wilson wrote:
> I haven't seen (or heard of) it happening. Please post a bug report
> on http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/ with a backtrace from one of
> the core dumps along with the relevant information about your setup,
> dialplan, chan_skype.conf, etc. If the
On Aug 20, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Remco Barendse wrote:
> I never used Skype myself but i installed it to try and i noticed
> that i
> got added by lots of strange skype users (spam bots?), i guess some of
> those were trying some funny stuff on my skype for asterisk account. I
> want to use Skype fo
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Terry Wilson wrote:
>>> Have you posted a bug describing the issues you are having at
>>> http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/
>>> yet? I would love to have the opportunity to actually fix any bugs
>>> that people find. :-)
>>
>> I installed the 1.0 release of Skype for Ast
>> Have you posted a bug describing the issues you are having at
>> http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/
>> yet? I would love to have the opportunity to actually fix any bugs
>> that people find. :-)
>
> I installed the 1.0 release of Skype for Asterisk and last night on my
> production box runn
Michael Graves wrote:
> I wonder if that was not a codec specific issue, but rather the matter
> of their license to the p2p technology provided by JoltID? Since Skype
> has recently dveloped their own codec (SILK) they could easily drop
> support for any codec that they previously licensed from
I wonder if that was not a codec specific issue, but rather the matter
of their license to the p2p technology provided by JoltID? Since Skype
has recently dveloped their own codec (SILK) they could easily drop
support for any codec that they previously licensed from outside. I
think that the failur
a few days ago slashdot (sorry i havent the link now) wrote about skype has
a very huge problem whit a licence in a core codec, and if they dont get an
aregment whit the codec owner they will close the doors...
David
2009/8/19 Thomas Kenyon
> Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> > Nope - but you are als
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> Nope - but you are also running on an unsupported version of asterisk,
> so I am not surprised. From the readme:
>
> ===[ Installation Overview
> ]===
>
> It is required that the proper version of Asterisk is installed
Oops sorry, the Asterisk version should read 1.4.26.1
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nope - but you are also running on an unsupported version of asterisk,
so I am not surprised. From the readme:
===[ Installation Overview ]===
Nope - but you are also running on an unsupported version of asterisk,
so I am not surprised. From the readme:
===[ Installation Overview ]===
It is required that the proper version of Asterisk is installed prior to
installing Skype For Asterisk. Sk
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Terry Wilson wrote:
>> That does sound a bit pricey, although it it's as stable as the latest
>> beta, I wont be buying it at all.
>
> Have you posted a bug describing the issues you are having at
> http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/
> yet? I would love to have the opport
Karl Fife wrote:
> Any idea what timeframe?
Not that I can disclose, no. Sorry.
> Can I assume that SFA licenses now will be valid for future releases?
Yes. It is quite unlikely (although not impossible, of course, like any
piece of software) that existing SFA licenses would not be valid for
fu
> I just want to also remind people that Skype for SIP is also to be
> released shortly. When I last talked to Skype they said it would be
> out in late July. So I assume if you wait another few more weeks
> the entire issue will be moot. No $60/channel fee, just the free
> SIP platform
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin P. Fleming"
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Skype for Asterisk -- Codec support
> Karl Fife wrote:
>
>> To some degree
> That does sound a bit pricey, although it it's as stable as the latest
> beta, I wont be buying it at all.
Have you posted a bug describing the issues you are having at
http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/
yet? I would love to have the opportunity to actually fix any bugs
that people find
Karl Fife wrote:
> To some degree, I (and I'm sure other wideband disciples), feel somewhat
> like the only guy on the block with a fax machine. Per Metcalfe's law it
> seemed that Skype (as a easily accessible namespace supporting wideband)
> could have been a shot in the arm for >8khz teleph
I just want to also remind people that Skype for SIP is also to be released
shortly. When I last talked to Skype they said it would be out in late
July. So I assume if you wait another few more weeks the entire issue will
be moot. No $60/channel fee, just the free SIP platform for people using
t
Lol but he has a good point and makes a lot of sense. Never thought about
that strategy...
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Kenyon
wrote:
> Michael Graves wrote:
> > Pricing is a very legitimate way to minimise support effort. It winnows
> > down the market size to a point where the com
Michael Graves wrote:
> Pricing is a very legitimate way to minimise support effort. It winnows
> down the market size to a point where the company offering the goods
> can sustain the projected per user support issues.
>
> You can always drop the price later on when you have a better handle on
>
Casey Boone wrote:
> I would have happily bought 20 channels at $10/channel, but at most will
> be buying only a single channel now :\
>
That does sound a bit pricey, although it it's as stable as the latest
beta, I wont be buying it at all.
___
-- Ba
Pricing is a very legitimate way to minimise support effort. It winnows
down the market size to a point where the company offering the goods
can sustain the projected per user support issues.
You can always drop the price later on when you have a better handle on
the per user support issue.
Micha
I would have happily bought 20 channels at $10/channel, but at most will
be buying only a single channel now :\
Pascal Bruno wrote:
> Not sure if anybody noticed, but it seems like Skype For Asterisk is out.
>
> $66 per channels, pretty pricey
>
> http://store.digium.com/productview.php?produ
Geoff Lane wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>
>> I was under the impression that Three (who I guess you're using)
>> placed a regular call over their network then "Skyped" it at their
>> HQ - rather than have the Skype client actually reside in the
>> handset.. (And
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Geraint Lee wrote:
> Good luck with the N95... my experiences of the N95 and SIP haven't been
> great... the phone likes to restart... regularly. Nokia may well have fixed
> these glitches by now though. Getting it configured was a bit of a mission
> too... and as expected the
Good luck with the N95... my experiences of the N95 and SIP haven't been
great... the phone likes to restart... regularly. Nokia may well have fixed
these glitches by now though. Getting it configured was a bit of a mission
too... and as expected the battery life shoots down when it's enabled...
so
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> I was under the impression that Three (who I guess you're using)
> placed a regular call over their network then "Skyped" it at their
> HQ - rather than have the Skype client actually reside in the
> handset.. (And I'm suspecting their 3G l
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Geoff Lane wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, Remco Barendse wrote:
>
>> But then again, who needs Skype for business purposes anyways, i
>> don't think there is a huge market for it.
>
> Me ... at least in theory! Our cellphones have built-in Skype, so a
> Skype gateway s
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009, Remco Barendse wrote:
> But then again, who needs Skype for business purposes anyways, i
> don't think there is a huge market for it.
Me ... at least in theory! Our cellphones have built-in Skype, so a
Skype gateway should give me call forwarding and diversion to our
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pascal Bruno wrote:
> Not sure if anybody noticed, but it seems like Skype For Asterisk is out.
>
> $66 per channels, pretty pricey
>
> http://store.digium.com/productview.php?product_code=1SFA0001
Yes, pretty pricey indeed especially considering that you can buy Skype
ATA
I am using the beta and its pretty good for remote access for clients
It would help if they had some discount structure for volume
Cheers Duncan
Pascal Bruno wrote:
> Not sure if anybody noticed, but it seems like Skype For Asterisk is out.
>
> $66 per channels, pretty pricey
>
> http://store.d
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:50 PM, John Todd wrote:
>
> I know many of you have been waiting for this for a while, so I'll
> keep this short: The Skype for Asterisk Public Beta is now available
> on the Digium store.
>
> We are pleased to announce the open beta of Skype For Asterisk is
> ready to
Pascal Bruno wrote:
> Well I think thats what the problem was, I dont have it named as eth0.
> So if your NIC is not labeled eth0 you cannot use skypeforasterisk???
> Why cant it just scan you nic handles? Can someone point me to where I
> can change the NIC name in the source file or somethi
Hi,
This is the error message I get. Any idea where I may find some further
debug logs?
> [Aug 3 08:01:23] ERROR[23831] chan_skype.c: Unable to start Skype For
> Asterisk library.
Thanks,
Emrah
Tim Panton wrote:
> I don't know then. My understanding is that the message is caused by
> the wrong
I don't know then. My understanding is that the message is caused by
the wrong skypeforasterisk process running.
- did you (ever) run it as a different user ?
If it is a test box, you could try a full reboot.
Tim.
On 2 Aug 2009, at 19:35, Emrah wrote:
Hi Tim,
I don't have any skypeforasteri
Hi Tim,
I don't have any skypeforasterisk process running. I tried to killall
-9 asterisk but it did not solve my issue.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks for your help,
Emrah
Tim Panton wrote:
> I had that too, I cured it by kill -9 'ing the skypeforasterisk
> process that was left over from
> the p
I had that too, I cured it by kill -9 'ing the skypeforasterisk
process that was left over from
the previous version of the beta.
Hope that helps.
Tim.
On 2 Aug 2009, at 11:20, Emrah wrote:
I reported an issue on Mantis (#14).
Waiting for an update.
http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/view
Well I think thats what the problem was, I dont have it named as eth0. So
if your NIC is not labeled eth0 you cannot use skypeforasterisk??? Why cant
it just scan you nic handles? Can someone point me to where I can change
the NIC name in the source file or something???
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:13 PM, randulo wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Pascal Bruno wrote:
> > So what do you think I can do to register my license? I am running
> > Asterisk 1.6.10 on CentOS 5.
>
> >>> Could not generate Host-ID.
> >>> Make sure that you have eth0 enabled.
>
> The MAC
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Pascal Bruno wrote:
> So what do you think I can do to register my license? I am running
> Asterisk 1.6.10 on CentOS 5.
>>> Could not generate Host-ID.
>>> Make sure that you have eth0 enabled.
The MAC is used in the scheme to register and it looks like it can't
be
So what do you think I can do to register my license? I am running
Asterisk 1.6.10 on CentOS 5.
Sent from my iPod
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:49 AM, Thomas Kenyon
wrote:
> Pascal Bruno wrote:
>> Unfortunately for me, I cannot register my license. Kept saying:
>>
>> Could not generate Host-ID.
>>
I reported an issue on Mantis (#14).
Waiting for an update.
http://betareports.digium.com/mantis/view.php?id=14
Emrah
Emrah wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I am experiencing the same problem, with the same error messages.
> Running Asterisk 1.6.1.0 on a Debian 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686
>
> Regards,
> Emrah
>
Hi Thomas,
I am experiencing the same problem, with the same error messages.
Running Asterisk 1.6.1.0 on a Debian 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686
Regards,
Emrah
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
> Thomas Kenyon wrote:
>
>> [2009-08-02 08:46:05] ERROR[23719]: astobj2.c:116 INTERNAL_OBJ: bad
>> magic number 0x25765c
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
>
> [2009-08-02 08:46:05] ERROR[23719]: astobj2.c:116 INTERNAL_OBJ: bad
> magic number 0x25765ca0 for 0x1390e20
> [2009-08-02 08:46:05] ERROR[23719]: astobj2.c:116 INTERNAL_OBJ: bad
> magic number 0x25765ca0 for 0x1390e20
>
chef*CLI> skype show users
Skype Users
[2009-08-02
Pascal Bruno wrote:
> Unfortunately for me, I cannot register my license. Kept saying:
>
> Could not generate Host-ID.
> Make sure that you have eth0 enabled.
>
> Any help would be appreciated
>
It uses the same licensing scheme as the G.729 licenses (so as soon as
you need to upgrade the mach
Unfortunately for me, I cannot register my license. Kept saying:
Could not generate Host-ID.
Make sure that you have eth0 enabled.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Tom Browning wrote:
>
> Nice job. It worked right away for me with my 10 channel trial license.
> Asterisk 1.4.26
>
> I'm already b
Unfortunately for me, I cannot register my license. Kept saying:
Could not generate Host-ID.
Make sure that you have eth0 enabled.
Any help would be appreciated
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Tom Browning wrote:
>
> Nice job. It worked right away for me with my 10 channel trial license.
>
Nice job. It worked right away for me with my 10 channel trial license.
Asterisk 1.4.26
I'm already building a dtmf access menu to bridge to my SIP world :-)
As much I hate Skype for being a closed system, it would make the ultimate
"remote" Asterisk extension as Skype drills through so many fir
> I have problems with it...
>
> [Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.cpp:1153 skype_cp_handler:
> Found license 'XX' providing 1 concurrent calls
> [Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.cpp:1000 display_host: Skype
> For Asterisk Host-ID: X
> [Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.
On 7/30/09, Steve Totaro wrote:
> The first time is always free :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Todd wrote:
>
>>
>> I know many of you have been waiting for this for a while, so I'll
>> keep this short: The Skype for Asterisk Public Beta is now available
>> on the Digium store.
>>
>
The first time is always free :)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Todd wrote:
>
> I know many of you have been waiting for this for a while, so I'll
> keep this short: The Skype for Asterisk Public Beta is now available
> on the Digium store.
>
> We are pleased to announce the open beta of
I have problems with it...
[Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.cpp:1153 skype_cp_handler: Found license
'XX' providing 1 concurrent calls
[Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.cpp:1000 display_host: Skype For Asterisk
Host-ID: X
[Jul 30 14:34:17] NOTICE[30529]: core.cpp:1320 sfa_st
On 27 Jun 2009, at 10:06, Olivier wrote:
Hi,
As many remember, almost one year this Skype for Asterisk extension
program was announced.
Has anyone tried it ?
Is there any available pricelist ?
I've just had a talk on Skype for Asterisk accepted at Astricon (www.astricon.net
), so
if yo
I received a phone call asking for specs, how I'd use, etc, etc and they
said they'd be turning my beta account up in another 6 weeks.
That was 3 weeks ago.
PB
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:31 AM, randulo wrote:
> >>> Though they have written me back twice to say "coming soon" I am still
> >>> wait
>>> Though they have written me back twice to say "coming soon" I am still
>>> waiting for the software...
>>>
>> So you'd rather have it even when it hasn't been finished?
>
> Umm, no, but then when a company says "looking for beta testers - please
> sign up now!" and then four months later has no
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Thomas Kenyon wrote:
> Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, randulo wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Olivier wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone tried it ?
Is there any available pricelist ?
>>> It is possible no one wants to answer this due to
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, randulo wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Olivier wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried it ?
>>> Is there any available pricelist ?
>> It is possible no one wants to answer this due to the NDA they had to sign?
>>
>
> Though they have w
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, randulo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Olivier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone tried it ?
>> Is there any available pricelist ?
>
> It is possible no one wants to answer this due to the NDA they had to sign?
>
Though they have written me back twice to say "coming
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone tried it ?
> Is there any available pricelist ?
It is possible no one wants to answer this due to the NDA they had to sign?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-
94 matches
Mail list logo
