On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
> Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I
> can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says:
>
> echo "You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp
> kernel installed."
> You do not app
Have you tried kernel-smp-devel?
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
> Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I
> can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says:
>
> echo "You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp
> kernel installed."
> You do not appear to h
No such thing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10]# up2date --showall | grep kernel
kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.athlon
kernel-2.4.21-53.EL.i686
kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-53.EL.i386
kernel-doc-2.4.21-53.EL.i386
kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-53.EL.i686
kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-53.EL.i686
kernel-pcmcia-cs-3
Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able
to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better
solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before.
Sorry.
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
> No such thing.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10]# up
Zaptel 1.4.10 has bugs or so I have heard.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Mik Cheez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able
> to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better
> solution. I can't
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
> > Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I
> > can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says:
> >
> > echo "You do not appear to have
/lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [/]# ll /lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 35 Apr 30 04:48
/lib/modules/2.4.21-53.ELsmp/build ->
../../../usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/
There's something wrong with this system
usr/src/linux-2.4.21-53.EL/.b
Mik Cheez wrote:
> Hmph...and it appears no kernel-smp-source exists. You should be able
> to compile going to a non-SMP kernel, but there must be a better
> solution. I can't believe this hasn't come up before.
>
> Sorry.
You only need the kernel headers in reality I believe. Why not just ma
.build file is missing in the kernel-source package. Solutions is:
Once you have the appropriate kernel sources installed you will
need to configure them. Execute the following commands:
cd /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
make mrproper
Exec
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
>
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:59:01AM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
> .build file is missing in the kernel-source package. Solutions is:
>
>
>Once you have the appropriate kernel sources installed you will
>need to configure them. Execute the following commands:
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo