Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users]Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-02-03 Thread Charles Wang
; Alistair Cunningham > > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:25 AM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: > > [Asterisk-Users]Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers > > > load balacing isn'

RE: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users]Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-02-01 Thread Rusty Shackleford
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Alistair Cunningham > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:25 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: Using *RT for HA purposes wa

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread Kristian Larsson
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:46:36PM +, Alistair Cunningham wrote: > Peter Bowyer wrote: > >I was thinking along the same lines, but for a dynamic setup it should > >be possible to have SER/OpenSER load balance REGISTER requests > >according to some strategy/metrics, and then forward INVITEs and

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 04/01/06, Alistair Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Bowyer wrote: > > I was thinking along the same lines, but for a dynamic setup it should > > be possible to have SER/OpenSER load balance REGISTER requests > > according to some strategy/metrics, and then forward INVITEs and other

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread Alistair Cunningham
Peter Bowyer wrote: I was thinking along the same lines, but for a dynamic setup it should be possible to have SER/OpenSER load balance REGISTER requests according to some strategy/metrics, and then forward INVITEs and other call-related traffic to the 'right' back-end server. Probably lots of r

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 04/01/06, Alistair Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tijmen, > > We use SER for this to load balance across multiple Asterisks. We then > use a custom program to monitor the health of the Asterisks and update > SER's configuration should one go down. 2 SERs share a single IP address > for

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread Alistair Cunningham
Tijmen, We use SER for this to load balance across multiple Asterisks. We then use a custom program to monitor the health of the Asterisks and update SER's configuration should one go down. 2 SERs share a single IP address for users to contact using heartbeat. It works well, and we have seve

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-04 Thread tijmen van den brink
I did some research about Asterisk and High Availability and some sort of load balancing. The High Availability issue isnn't much of a problem. I did it with heartbeat en realtime. But the load balancing issue is realy a problem. You want a load balancer to make decisions based on call ID. The call

Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-03 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Asterisk wrote: In my case I would be using DNS round robin. So a UA would only be registering to one * server at a time. So wouldn't in fact be an active/passive? No. You have said that you want the _other_ servers to be aware of that phone's registration and be able to deliver calls to

RE: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

2006-01-03 Thread Asterisk
leming Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:13 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers Mike Fedyk wrote: > With the current *RT release? Yes. The crux of the is