Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Tom, IIRC, your original task was to use Remote Desktop (RDP) from a remote location and access a PC on a LAN whose default gateway was down. You proved NAT forwarding on the AstLinux would not work since the PC's default gateway was not the AstLinux box. The above could be done by enablin

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Tom Chadwin
> You may also need to have your gateway/router device have a route to the OpenVPN subnet that identifies the Astlinux box as the gateway for the OpenVPN subnet. But of course the situation I am trying to handle is when the main gateway is down. Will clients still e able to route to the VPN subnet

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-12 Thread Tom Chadwin
t' Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Tom, You may also need to have your gateway/router device have a route to the OpenVPN subnet that identifies the Astlinux box as the gateway for the OpenVPN subnet. Darrick -Original Message- From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:nnpait.servi...@googl

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Darrick Hartman
10:35 AM To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Hi Lonnie To clarify: if I set the Astlinux box up as a VPN server (probably OpenVPN road warrior), and I connect to that remotely, will I be able to reach other machines on the remote LAN, even though t

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
ux box > set as their default gateway/route? > > Thanks > > Tom > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:nnpait.servi...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 10 December 2012 16:29 > To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [Astlinux-u

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-11 Thread Tom Chadwin
-Original Message- From: Tom Chadwin [mailto:nnpait.servi...@googlemail.com] Sent: 10 December 2012 16:29 To: 'AstLinux Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Understood. No, we have no VPNs set up on the Astlinux box - the firewall on the main line (which was down)

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com] Sent: 10 December 2012 16:27 To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Cc: Tom Chadwin Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Tom, I see what you are trying to do, but the source address of your NAT EXT-LAN packet to the PC will be the address the PC sends the reply

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com] > Sent: 10 December 2012 15:47 > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List > Cc: Tom Chadwin > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule > > Hi Tom, > > The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule > applies to,

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
com] Sent: 10 December 2012 15:47 To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Cc: Tom Chadwin Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule Hi Tom, The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule applies to, by default it is 0/0 which is any external IP. You probably

Re: [Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Lonnie Abelbeck
Hi Tom, The Firewall tab's "NAT EXT:" entry specifies which external IP the rule applies to, by default it is 0/0 which is any external IP. You probably only have one external IP address. So, something like this would work for RDP -- NAT EXT-LAN Protocol: TCP Src: 0/0 Port: 3389 Dst: 192.16

[Astlinux-users] NAT rule

2012-12-10 Thread Tom Chadwin
Hello all Just lost main connection to a remote site, but the Astlinux box (also on the LAN) on its own line is up and reachable. I'm therefore trying to set up a port forward on the Astlinux box to allow me to RDP from here to a Windows box on the LAN. Have added a "NAT EXT>LAN" rule. This bring