Am 19.11.2011 um 11:14 schrieb Michael Keuter:
>
> Am 19.11.2011 um 10:43 schrieb Julian Lyndon-Smith:
>
>> Right.
>>
>> Checked out the branches/1.0 code, followed developer instructions.
>> However, I get the error
>>
>> "toolchain/build: No such file or directory"
>>
>> I seem to remember
Am 19.11.2011 um 10:43 schrieb Julian Lyndon-Smith:
> Right.
>
> Checked out the branches/1.0 code, followed developer instructions.
> However, I get the error
>
> "toolchain/build: No such file or directory"
>
> I seem to remember that the build instructions for 1.0 are different,
> but can't
Right.
Checked out the branches/1.0 code, followed developer instructions.
However, I get the error
"toolchain/build: No such file or directory"
I seem to remember that the build instructions for 1.0 are different,
but can't find the documentation or email.
Could someone point this newbie to th
that's great . Will keep you informed.
Julian
On 19 November 2011 01:00, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> The AstLinux 1.0 branch now has support for Asterisk 10 for development
> testing.
>
> As Michael stated, the sqlite3 package must be enabled, and it appears to
> basically work wit
Hi Julian,
The AstLinux 1.0 branch now has support for Asterisk 10 for development testing.
As Michael stated, the sqlite3 package must be enabled, and it appears to
basically work with very limited testing. The astdb database has been replaced
with astdb.sqlite3, so we should symlink that to
Am 18.11.2011 um 11:55 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck:
> Julian,
>
> Honestly, Asterisk 10 was not on our radar at the moment.
>
> Does Asterisk 10 use the same file layout as 1.4 and 1.8 ? Are the
> sounds/moh files located in the same place, etc. ? If so, not much changing
> to our package/aster
Julian,
Honestly, Asterisk 10 was not on our radar at the moment.
Does Asterisk 10 use the same file layout as 1.4 and 1.8 ? Are the sounds/moh
files located in the same place, etc. ? If so, not much changing to our
package/asterisk/asterisk.mk should be necessary to give it a try.
Lonnie
Only because we are currently using 10 in development, testing and
production ;)
We want to move from large servers to a number of small fanless boxes,
and astlinux is ideal for that and virtualisation.
Julian
On 17 November 2011 00:27, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
> Julian,
> Why cross the river be
Julian,
Why cross the river before getting there?
Asterisk 10 is barely on RC2.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> what would I need to do in order to build an astlinux system but using
> asterisk-10 ?
>
> Julian
>
> --
> Julian Lyndon-Smith
> IT Director, Dot R Limit
