Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi

2024-05-07 Thread Konrad Dybcio
On 5/6/24 12:39, Marc Gonzalez wrote: On 29/04/2024 16:07, Marc Gonzalez wrote: The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator to complete initialization. If the indicator is not received, then the device remains unusable. cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work() Several msm8998-based devi

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi

2024-05-06 Thread Marc Gonzalez
On 29/04/2024 16:07, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator > to complete initialization. If the indicator is not > received, then the device remains unusable. > > cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work() > > Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi

2024-04-30 Thread Jeff Johnson
On 4/29/2024 7:07 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator > to complete initialization. If the indicator is not > received, then the device remains unusable. > > cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work() > > Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue

[PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: set qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator for wifi

2024-04-29 Thread Marc Gonzalez
The ath10k driver waits for an "MSA_READY" indicator to complete initialization. If the indicator is not received, then the device remains unusable. cf. ath10k_qmi_driver_event_work() Several msm8998-based devices are affected by this issue. Oddly, it seems safe to NOT wait for the indicator, and