On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:27:19PM +0100, Paride Legovini wrote:
But I suppose that placing this in debugfs is temporary, as the end
users (afaik) are not supposed to use it. Am I wrong?
Well, we could leave it in debugfs forever to make it easy for users
to test out the combinations without
Thanks Bob. I'll make this patch as soon as I have time.
--
dave
--
Bob Copeland wrote:
Add two new debugfs files, led_pin and led_polarity, to make it easier
for users to find the right numbers for their system.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland m...@bobcopeland.com
---
Dave,
Please
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 07:13:03PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
+(id-subdevice == (u16) PCI_ANY_ID ||
+ id-subdevice == dev-subsystem_device));
+}
This is wrong. Subids might legally be 0x which is (u16)PCI_ANY_ID.
Why not use pci_device_id table with pci_match_id
On 15.2.2009 14:47, Bob Copeland wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:27:39PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
So I finally managed to hit this on 2.6.29-rc3. It is hard to
reproduce, so I hope so much information is enough to give you a good
guess. This time it hit while trying to connect to an open
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:27 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote:
Actually, I remembered in the dark recesses of my moldering brain
that someone had a lost patch for this a while ago, so I searched
the archives. Pavel, ok to add your s-o-b?
Since my patch was dropped and the new patch was implemented
