On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Jiri Moravec wrote:
>> country 98:
>> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>> (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR
>> (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>> (54
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Jiri Moravec wrote:
> country 98:
> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
> (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR
> (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
>
> ~ # crda
> COUNTRY envir
On Monday 29 March 2010 11:02:12 Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:49:52PM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > + } else if (strncmp(buf, "noise-low", 8) == 0) {
> > + ath5k_ani_set_noise_immunity_level(sc->ah, 0);
> > + } else if (strncmp(buf, "noise-high", 9) == 0) {
>
>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:52:11AM +0530, anmol khurana wrote:
> I mean ,in most softwares ,we have the source code which can be simply
> compiled and run to see the changes made in the source code .
> Is it the same with driver's or do I need to do something different ?
Yes, just change and reloa
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:49:52PM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> + } else if (strncmp(buf, "noise-low", 8) == 0) {
> + ath5k_ani_set_noise_immunity_level(sc->ah, 0);
> + } else if (strncmp(buf, "noise-high", 9) == 0) {
The number of characters here is off-by-one.
I also tried
Review spotted a couple of strange invocations to
ieee80211_wake_queues that could potentially cause problems:
- queues are awakened in the calibration tasklet before
phy calibration, and then again after calibration
- queues are awakened inside reset when we're trying to
drain the ath5k
We check the bounds on pdadc once when correcting for
negative curves but not when we later copy values from
from the pdadc_tmp array, leading to a potential overrun.
Although we shouldn't hit this case in practice, let's
be consistent.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland
---
From: Bob Copeland
As pointed out by Benoit Papillault, there is a potential
race condition between the host and the hardware in reading
the next link in the transmit descriptor list:
cpu0 hw
tx for buf completed
raise tx_ok interrupt
process buf
If the symbol offset is 46, it will be counted in both
the third and fourth bytes of the mask, and in this
case the shift will be negative which can pollute
high order bits in the mask. This may negatively impact
OFDM symbol detection.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/at
These channels aren't selectable anyway, but our calculations
for 2.5 mhz frequencies are incorrect. The value is supposed to
be:
(frequency - reference) * (10/25)
i.e., divide by 2.5, but we were instead doing:
(10 * frequency - reference) / 25.
Additionally, the check for (frequency % 5
Hi,
Here are some patches for ath5k, based on top of Bruno's ANI
patchset. None of these are really serious; I don't know of
any specific reports that are fixed by these. Comments
welcome.
Bob Copeland (5):
ath5k: fix off-by-one in pilot magnitude mask
ath5k: correct channel setting for 2.5
Hi
As a part of my wireless network project ,I wanted to work on ath5k drivers
and see how it effects my wireless card working.
What is the easiest way of making changes in the driver source code and
compile them to see changes made to the wireless card workings ?
I mean ,in most softwares ,we ha
On 28.3.2010 14:44, Jiri Moravec wrote:
> On 28.3.2010 13:16, Lukáš Turek wrote:
>> On 28.3.2010 12:50 Jiri Moravec wrote:
>>> As I reported 22.3., first founded atheros card reported these channels as
>>> disabled. If this card is second, then these channels on second card are
>>> enabled. WHY?
>>
On 28.3.2010 13:16, Lukáš Turek wrote:
> On 28.3.2010 12:50 Jiri Moravec wrote:
>> As I reported 22.3., first founded atheros card reported these channels as
>> disabled. If this card is second, then these channels on second card are
>> enabled. WHY?
> I reported the same problem recently:
> https:
On 28.3.2010 12:50 Jiri Moravec wrote:
> As I reported 22.3., first founded atheros card reported these channels as
> disabled. If this card is second, then these channels on second card are
> enabled. WHY?
I reported the same problem recently:
https://lists.ath5k.org/pipermail/ath5k-devel/2010-Mar
I noticed another strange issues on my system:
1) card ignore regdom (on 2.6.33 kernel, wireless fully functional)
~ # iw phy
Wiphy phy0
Band 1:
Frequencies:
16 matches
Mail list logo
