Hi,
May I know whats the fastest way to force send a response packet back to
someone upon receiving a probe request? I am trying to create a relay sort of
experiment which involves two computers running ath5k, comp1 will send a probe
request to comp2 and then wait for comp2 to reply with probe
Hi All,
Let's hear it for chips without available specs!
Does anyone remember the days when paper specs arrived in plain
envelopes with no return address when you asked the manufacturer for some
real support?
And lets hope they are REAL low in price!
wiz
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010,
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:20 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:09 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Atheros card on Acer Aspire One (AOA150, Atheros Communications Inc. AR5001
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:001c] (rev 01))
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
(ok, I might switch back ath5k to work on this, but opening AAO is
pain.. on the other hand, I'm just user in this case and pretty
unwilling to work with dual-license)
What do you mean?
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:49 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
Quoting Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com:
(ok, I might switch back ath5k to work on this, but opening AAO is
pain.. on the other hand, I'm just user in this case and pretty
unwilling to work with dual-license)
What do you
I'm looking to see if there is any interest in adding AR5513 support
to the ath5k HAL. I have one of the devices myself and would love to
add support to the HAL for this device(It's the only missing one, no?)
I did some preliminary mmio traces on the binary ndiswrappered
drivers, and it looks
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
dual-licensed so patch can't be accepted. So if I got it right, patch
has to be remade from scratch by someone who really knows about pci
registers etc. I
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Patch I made uses GPL code from e1000e, but since ath5k is
dual-licensed so patch can't be accepted. So if I got it right, patch
has to be remade from
Note: this e-mail is on a public mailing list.
David, what's AR5513? Is it a legacy device?
Luis
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:00:55AM -0700, Zabb65 wrote:
I'm looking to see if there is any interest in adding AR5513 support
to the ath5k HAL. I have one of the devices myself and would love to
Data Falcon.
A chip that has been long EOL.
It barely saw a real life.
Not a supported hardware for at least 5 years now.
-Original Message-
From: Luis Rodriguez
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:55 AM
To: David Quan
Cc: Zabb65; ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] AR5513
10 matches
Mail list logo
