On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Brown wrote:
> I'm trying to replace an existing 900MHz 11000 meter link w/ two Alix
> boxes with Ubiquiti XR9's. These are "Atheros Communications Inc. AR5413
> 802.11abg NIC (rev 01)" radios that down convert to the 900MHz ISM
> band.
>
> I'm using a 5MHz c
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2010/11/20 Brian Prodoehl :
>>
>> That sounds like great stuff. What does this look like to nl80211?
>> Did you get the spur mitigation filters adjusted for the various
>> modes? Are the rate tables now dep
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2010/11/13 Nick Kossifidis :
>> Hello people ;-)
>>
>> Last 2 weeks I've been working on adding half/quarter rate support and
>> (static) turbo mode support on ath5k. Here is what i have so far:
>>
>> All 3 modes are based on the same mech
I have a patch set which adds pretty nice support to ath5k for the
900MHz cards out there, but right now the regulatory support I have
for them is a hack. CRDA devs, are you open to adding the 900MHz ISM
band to your database? Have you thought about how you might want to
support the 3.65GHz licen
I'm running the 20080925 snapshot of compat-wireless-old, and I'm
seeing disconnects during large file transfers with the AR2425. I say
"disconnects" because I'm set up promiscuously in IBSS mode, so it
isn't just a simple disassociation. When it dies, I see this in
dmesg:
ath0: failed to set fr
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/22 Brian Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig was
>>> 24Mb, Higher speeds did not respond. Same location,
> Ath5k is much slower then madwifi. Best speed I could get with iwconfig was
> 24Mb, Higher speeds did not respond. Same location, same computer, same AP
> with
> madwifi I get the full 54Mb with no drops. This will be a blocker for eeepc
> users and distros with the 2.6.27 kernels
I'm ch
