On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:19:04PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:07:21 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I know HW leds has been a much requested item and would suggest this is
> > pushed into testing soon.
>
> Great, thanks for testing and the patch. I'll send it on tonight,
>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:07:21 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I know HW leds has been a much requested item and would suggest this is
> pushed into testing soon.
Great, thanks for testing and the patch. I'll send it on tonight,
with your Tested-by if you like.
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:31:40PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> >
> > No, they look very similar, except mine is against 2.6.29, so I haven't
> > used sw_scan_{start,complete}
>
> Yeah, they are practically the same. One good (or bad) thing
>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I have an initial patch which gives me working leds on my DWL-G630.
>
> It will need cleaning up a bit. In particular, I am not sure if using it
> whenever SOFTLED is not activated is OK. I don't have any other
> hardware, so I can't test.
>
>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:13:33PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I have an initial patch which gives me working leds on my DWL-G630.
> >
> > It will need cleaning up a bit. In particular, I am not sure if using it
> > whenever SOFTLED is not a
I have an initial patch which gives me working leds on my DWL-G630.
It will need cleaning up a bit. In particular, I am not sure if using it
whenever SOFTLED is not activated is OK. I don't have any other
hardware, so I can't test.
Comments please
Mark
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/b
