On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:09:04AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:03 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > > When we remove the active interface, there's no need to continue
> > > sending beacons; doing so would caus
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:09:04AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:03 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > When we remove the active interface, there's no need to continue
> > sending beacons; doing so would cause a null pointer deref in
> > ieee80211_beacon_get(). Disable the int
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 23:03 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> When we remove the active interface, there's no need to continue
> sending beacons; doing so would cause a null pointer deref in
> ieee80211_beacon_get(). Disable the interrupt in remove_interface
> and add a WARN_ON(!vif) in case there are
When we remove the active interface, there's no need to continue
sending beacons; doing so would cause a null pointer deref in
ieee80211_beacon_get(). Disable the interrupt in remove_interface
and add a WARN_ON(!vif) in case there are other instances lurking.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland
---
dri
