On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>> 2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>>>
>>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>>> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir m
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>>
>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir move
>> itself. Would you guys mind sending rebased ontop of the d
2009/4/13 Luis R. Rodriguez :
>
> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir move
> itself. Would you guys mind sending rebased ontop of the dir move?
When will the move happen on w-t ? I t 'll be much ea
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis
>> wrote:
>> > 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>>
>> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
>>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>
> If you add ath/ to your patches I think they should apply. I think its
> easier to rebase the patches ontop of the dir move than the dir m
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
>> Here are a few random patches I have sitting in my local tree, currently
>> based before the ath5k/9k merge. The last one comes from a perl
>> script I wrote to check the initvals (also wrote one to check rfgai
2009/4/13 Bob Copeland :
> Here are a few random patches I have sitting in my local tree, currently
> based before the ath5k/9k merge. The last one comes from a perl
> script I wrote to check the initvals (also wrote one to check rfgain
> values, but no errors there). Comments welcome.
>
> Bob Co
Here are a few random patches I have sitting in my local tree, currently
based before the ath5k/9k merge. The last one comes from a perl
script I wrote to check the initvals (also wrote one to check rfgain
values, but no errors there). Comments welcome.
Bob Copeland (5):
ath5k: use bool for m
