Jonathan Guerin writes:
> Any chance we can 'acquire' those test plans? ;-)
Most probably you need to pay kilo dollars to get access to them.
--
Kalle Valo
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listi
Jonathan Guerin writes:
>> the thing is, like bob said, that we don't really know much about what the HW
>> expects in some of these registers, so unless you can prove your changes to
>> be
>> correct - e.g. by measurements which fit the theoretical model better, or by
>> better thruput, it's ha
Jonathan Guerin writes:
> So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build,
> even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users?
If "an out-of-the-box build" means correctly working 802.11 device
then my opinion is yes, we should strive to match the spec even if
Any chance we can 'acquire' those test plans? ;-)
--
Jonathan Guerin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jonathan Guerin writes:
>
>> So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build,
>> even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users?
>
> I
On Wed September 15 2010 16:27:01 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build,
> even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users?
sure, we need to comply to the specs.
bruno
> --
> Jonathan Guerin
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:17
So, we would prefer to match the spec for an out-of-the-box build,
even tho it would appear to be a worse-performing driving to users?
--
Jonathan Guerin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jonathan Guerin writes:
>
>>> the thing is, like bob said, that we don't really know m
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed September 15 2010 12:28:36 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>> >> Should all of the init be changed to use these functions, along with
>> >> #define init values?
>> >
>> > i think it would be best if we could remove the initvals alltoghether and
On Wed September 15 2010 12:28:36 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> >> Should all of the init be changed to use these functions, along with
> >> #define init values?
> >
> > i think it would be best if we could remove the initvals alltoghether and
> > use the function to set the ack timeout. but i'm not su
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed September 15 2010 12:01:50 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
>> > On Wed September 15 2010 10:56:32 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>> >> According to the 802.11-2007 spec document, the ACKTimeout
On Wed September 15 2010 12:01:50 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > On Wed September 15 2010 10:56:32 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> >> According to the 802.11-2007 spec document, the ACKTimeout value is
> >> (Section 9.2.8 ACK procedure):
> >> ACKTimeou
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>>
>> on 5212 this is 1000 in A mode and 1760 in G mode, which would result in a
>> timeout of 25 and 40.
>
> We have a 5213 chip - does this default to the 5212 branch inside ath5k?
>
Never mind, I found it...
$$ attach.c
else if (srev ==
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Wed September 15 2010 10:56:32 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>> According to the 802.11-2007 spec document, the ACKTimeout value is
>> (Section 9.2.8 ACK procedure):
>> ACKTimeout = aSIFSTime + aSlotTime + aPHY-RX-START-Delay
>>
>> >From Table 1
On Wed September 15 2010 10:56:32 Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> According to the 802.11-2007 spec document, the ACKTimeout value is
> (Section 9.2.8 ACK procedure):
> ACKTimeout = aSIFSTime + aSlotTime + aPHY-RX-START-Delay
>
> >From Table 17-15—OFDM PHY characteristics, the values are:
> aSIFSTime = 1
According to the 802.11-2007 spec document, the ACKTimeout value is
(Section 9.2.8 ACK procedure):
ACKTimeout = aSIFSTime + aSlotTime + aPHY-RX-START-Delay
>From Table 17-15—OFDM PHY characteristics, the values are:
aSIFSTime = 16
aSlotTime = 9
aPHY-RX-START-Delay = 25
Therefore, ACKTimeout = 50
14 matches
Mail list logo
