On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Jiri Moravec wrote:
> On 29.3.2010 04:26, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> I'm not sure what lock this is, can you do:
>>
>> gdb cfg80211.ko
>> gdb> l *(wiphy_unregister+0x9d)
>>
>
> Yes I can and did, but lack any experience with gdb:
>
> ~ # gdb /lib/modules/2.6.32.10/kern
On 29.3.2010 04:26, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> [] ? _spin_lock_irq+0x1d/0x40
>> [] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x17/0x40
>> [] wiphy_unregister+0x9d/0x1c0 [cfg80211]
>> [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
>> [] ieee80211_unregister_hw+0xa9/0xf0 [mac80211]
>
> I'm not sure what lock this is, can yo
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Jiri Moravec wrote:
>> country 98:
>> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
>> (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR
>> (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
>> (54
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:50:52PM +0200, Jiri Moravec wrote:
> country 98:
> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20)
> (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR
> (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS
>
> ~ # crda
> COUNTRY envir
On 28.3.2010 13:16, Lukáš Turek wrote:
> On 28.3.2010 12:50 Jiri Moravec wrote:
>> As I reported 22.3., first founded atheros card reported these channels as
>> disabled. If this card is second, then these channels on second card are
>> enabled. WHY?
> I reported the same problem recently:
> https:
On 28.3.2010 12:50 Jiri Moravec wrote:
> As I reported 22.3., first founded atheros card reported these channels as
> disabled. If this card is second, then these channels on second card are
> enabled. WHY?
I reported the same problem recently:
https://lists.ath5k.org/pipermail/ath5k-devel/2010-Mar
I noticed another strange issues on my system:
1) card ignore regdom (on 2.6.33 kernel, wireless fully functional)
~ # iw phy
Wiphy phy0
Band 1:
Frequencies:
