On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
This series started off to extend support for ar9271 on ath9k_hw
but after review of the phy related code I noticed a fix for
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
This series started off to extend support for
Devices with external radios have revisions which we can count on.
On single chip solutions these EEPROM values for these radio revision
also exist but are not meaningful as the radios are embedded onto the
same chip. Each single-chip device evolves together as one device.
Signed-off-by: Luis R.
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index f65b591..50be381 100644
---
While reviewing ar9271 radio revisions I determined the radio revision
does not apply although it can be populated in the EEPROM. This changes
the hw probe print to reflect this for single chips and throws the code
into hw code to be shared with ath9k_htc.
Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
ath9k_hw: move
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:23:44AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Michael Buesch m...@bu3sch.de wrote:
On Monday 26 October 2009 17:21:40 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static int ath_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
On Monday 26 October 2009 17:21:40 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static int ath_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
struct pci_device_id *id)
u32 val;
int ret = 0;
Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com writes:
Devices with external radios have revisions which we can count on.
On single chip solutions these EEPROM values for these radio revision
also exist but are not meaningful as the radios are embedded onto the
same chip. Each single-chip device
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:31:44PM -0700, Kalle Valo wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com writes:
Devices with external radios have revisions which we can count on.
On single chip solutions these EEPROM values for these radio revision
also exist but are not meaningful as the
Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com writes:
I think you should provide the size of hw_name to this function and
use snprintf() to avoid writing out of bounds.
I was going to do this but since I know the users of it and control
it seemed to not matter. I'll respin with this added, better
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:15:13PM -0700, Kalle Valo wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com writes:
I think you should provide the size of hw_name to this function and
use snprintf() to avoid writing out of bounds.
I was going to do this but since I know the users of it and
Hello,
I keep dropping packets with the current wireless drivers. I wanted to try
the compat-wireless install but I'm not sure how to download and install in
the command line of Arch Linux. Could someone point me in the right
direction?
Thanks,
Danny
13 matches
Mail list logo
