Why don't you give compat-wireless packages a try? I've upgraded my
kernel only after trying out a 2.6.34 compat-wireless package. You can
find them on the linuxwireless website or google for it.
On 6/16/10, RHS Linux User wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I notice that the wireless driver version in xp
Deri James wrote:
> As an initial test I added the USB device to be treated the same as
> 0CF3:9271
> (using current Compat Wireles source). On insertion I got this:-
>
> Jun 15 18:53:59 dombey klogd: usb 1-3: new high speed USB device using
> ehci_hcd and address 4
> Jun 15 18:53:59 dombey kl
On 2010-06-16 1:32 AM, RHS Linux User wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I notice that the wireless driver version in xpud works reliably,
> while the version in puppy does not? The puppy version comes up OK, but
> then dies after a short time (minutes)?
>
> I wonder if the wireless driver can (eas
Hi All,
I notice that the wireless driver version in xpud works reliably,
while the version in puppy does not? The puppy version comes up OK, but
then dies after a short time (minutes)?
I wonder if the wireless driver can (easily?) be arranged to be kernel
version independent? It would
Hello,
Looking at the .inf file supplied with this usb stick, this seems very similar
to the devices supported already by this driver:-
> [Atheros]
> ; DisplayName Section DeviceID
> ; --- ---
> ; Atheros
> %ATHER.D
On 2010-06-14 1:58 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 2010 22:16:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Strife
> wrote:
>> Sometimes the card stops working all together (cannot scan, connect,
>> etc.), I have to ifconfig wlan0 down; rmmod ath9k; modprobe ath9k;
>> ifconfig wlan0 up to get it started again. Th
> I observe following problems when I ping (1000 echo requests / sec) a
> netbook over an ad-hoc network running linux 2.6.31.5 (wireless hw:
> AR5B95) w/ ATH9K kernel modules: 1) after 2-3 seconds it seems that the
> card completely goes silent. Stops responding to pings, only solution is
> to rel
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:11:13 +0300, Alphan Ulusoy
wrote:
> After checking the linuxwireless website I've decided to upgrade my
> kernel. I am running 2.6.34 now and everything seems good enough for
> me. If I have further problems I will report for sure.
>
At least in my case, I still have to re
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:00:10 +0300, Alphan Ulusoy
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I observe following problems when I ping (1000 echo requests / sec) a
> netbook over an ad-hoc network running linux 2.6.31.5 (wireless hw:
> AR5B95) w/ ATH9K kernel modules:
>
> 1) after 2-3 seconds it seems that the card co
On 15 Jun, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:00:10 +0300, Alphan Ulusoy
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I observe following problems when I ping (1000 echo requests / sec) a
>> netbook over an ad-hoc network running linux 2.6.31.5 (wireless hw:
>> AR5B95) w/ ATH9K kernel m
On Sat, 29 May 2010 22:16:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Strife
wrote:
> Sometimes the card stops working all together (cannot scan, connect,
> etc.), I have to ifconfig wlan0 down; rmmod ath9k; modprobe ath9k;
> ifconfig wlan0 up to get it started again. There is also no
> interference in my area as well
Hi all,
I observe following problems when I ping (1000 echo requests / sec) a netbook
over an ad-hoc network running linux 2.6.31.5 (wireless hw: AR5B95) w/ ATH9K
kernel modules:
1) after 2-3 seconds it seems that the card completely goes silent. Stops
responding to pings, only solution is to r
Dear ath9k developers,
My name is Baldo, I work as a researcher at the University Miguel Hernández
of Elche. I've recently bought two different WiFi card with the atheros
chipset (SR71x and SR71-USB) and I use the ath9k driver to control them.
I'm new ath9k user and I have a question/doubts that I
13 matches
Mail list logo
