Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: Dump base eeprom header for UB91/94/95

2011-05-02 Thread Sujith
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:54:17AM -0700, Sujith wrote: > > Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > Do you really think that everyone will be happy to recompile their > > > stripped & heavily > > > customised embedded kernels/or compat-wireless just to enable DEBUG and > > > w

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: Dump base eeprom header for UB91/94/95

2011-05-02 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:54:17AM -0700, Sujith wrote: > Christian Lamparter wrote: > > Do you really think that everyone will be happy to recompile their stripped > > & heavily > > customised embedded kernels/or compat-wireless just to enable DEBUG and > > waste precious resources? Even with a

[ath9k-devel] More on signal and noise

2011-05-02 Thread Eduard GV
Hi all, Just three questions. I need per-packet SNR information and my first guess was to inspect "last_signal" from debugfs. Values range from -30 to -60. last_signal file should contain signal (dBm) of last received frame (from sta_info.h), right? That explains values obtained. But... 1) This v

Re: [ath9k-devel] A problem about signal noise

2011-05-02 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:50 PM, kang haiyang wrote: > Thanks a lot. > > I got almost same noise floor with 20/40Mhz. > maybe i need to try with ath9k to see the result. for ath9k, this command may help(please install iw) iw dev survey dump > > On 05/02/2011 04:00 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote: >> f

Re: [ath9k-devel] A problem about signal noise

2011-05-02 Thread kang haiyang
Thanks a lot. I got almost same noise floor with 20/40Mhz. maybe i need to try with ath9k to see the result. On 05/02/2011 04:00 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote: > for AR9160 the noise floor can vary based on the bandwidth 20/40MHz > and as per docs, the values you are getting are acceptable(more than >

Re: [ath9k-devel] A problem about signal noise

2011-05-02 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, kang haiyang wrote: > hi all, > > I found the signal noise in packet (captured by a netgear card) with > 5Ghz and > 2.4Ghz is very different with the same ap and client. > > For 2.4Ghz (20Mhz bandwidth) , the average signal noise is about -80 ~ > -90 dbm, > 5Ghz(40