Re: [ath9k-devel] Ubiquity SR71-E: direct probe timed out

2011-08-01 Thread Alex Hacker
Important exeption is the channel sidebands and baseband filters fall-off. You sholdn't use adjacnt channels for different networks. At least 40MHz gap should be left between H20 channels, and as much as 80MHz between HT40+ and HT40- channels. On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:19:03AM +0600, Alex Hacker

Re: [ath9k-devel] Some novice questions

2011-08-01 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:   Hi, I'm very excited in the list. It's my first time to use a mailing list, so I'm afraid there are some impolite to you. If there, please tell me.   I have some question about mailing list of ath9k.   I want modify NAV

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ubiquity SR71-E: direct probe timed out

2011-08-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
I've also noticed that there's sometimes quite noticable differences in how clean the output is from various NICs. Eg, when pushing the SR-2 or SR-71A at max power, versus the Unex DNMA series high power NICs. The Unex ones are much, much cleaner. Adrian On 1 August 2011 16:31, Alex Hacker

Re: [ath9k-devel] Some novice questions

2011-08-01 Thread pangyunong
Thank you for your reply! But how can it be modified NAV to be 0 each time I transmit a frame? Can I control the value by flashing the firmware in my network card? On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 14:43 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [ath9k-devel] Some novice questions

2011-08-01 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:00 PM, pangyunong 029...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply! But how can it be modified NAV to be 0 each time I transmit a frame? Can I control the value by flashing the firmware in my network card? no, there is no firmware for ath9k. i tried to force the value

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ubiquity SR71-E: direct probe timed out

2011-08-01 Thread Alex Hacker
Hi, Adrian! Yeah, the Ubiquity is young company trying to get his place on the market. So that they like to overdrive Sirenza RF PAs to impermissible levels. This leads to raising unwanted emission in adjacent channels, but I don't believe that they have a fake FCC certificate. :) Another issue

Re: [ath9k-devel] Atheros WiFi only works when I reboot from windows.

2011-08-01 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vic Demuzere v...@demuzere.be wrote: On 29 July 2011 12:41, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote: please provide lspci I have attached the output of lspci. what is the kernel version you are using , can you get debug messages

[ath9k-devel] code of AP mode

2011-08-01 Thread pangyunong
Which file contain the information about AP mode? I use 'find' but no appropriate result Regards, Yunong ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

[ath9k-devel] Bug in patch selecting MCS?

2011-08-01 Thread Lito Kriara
Dear all, I tried to use the patch in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/804472/ in order to use a specific MCS instead of adapting the MCS through minstrel. However, I noticed that the throughput I could get that way was maximum about 45Mbps. I looked more into it and I saw that A-MPDU