On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Bartek Knapek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am using ath9k in AP mode. Several times a day clients loose
> connectivity for a short while, which often causes e.g. the established
> TCP/IP sessions to be dropped.
>
> When running 2.6.39.3 I was getting "Attempting to restart t
Dear all,
I tried to use the patch in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/804472/
in order to use a specific MCS instead of adapting the MCS through
minstrel. However, I noticed that the throughput I could get that way
was maximum about 45Mbps. I looked more into it and I saw that A-MPDU
fra
Which file contain the information about AP mode? I use 'find' but no
appropriate result
Regards,
Yunong
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On 29 July 2011 12:41, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
>>
>> please provide lspci
>>
>
> I have attached the output of lspci.
>
>>
>> what is the kernel version you are using , can you get debug messages
>> http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath
Hi, Adrian!
Yeah, the Ubiquity is young company trying to get his place on the market.
So that they like to overdrive Sirenza RF PAs to impermissible levels. This
leads to raising unwanted emission in adjacent channels, but I don't
believe that they have a fake FCC certificate. :) Another issue wit
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:00 PM, pangyunong <029...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply!
> But how can it be modified NAV to be 0 each time I transmit a frame?
> Can I control the value by flashing the firmware in my network card?
no, there is no firmware for ath9k. i tried to force the va
Thank you for your reply!
But how can it be modified NAV to be 0 each time I transmit a frame?
Can I control the value by flashing the firmware in my network card?
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 14:43 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong <029...@gmail.com> wrote
I've also noticed that there's sometimes quite noticable differences
in how "clean" the output is from various NICs.
Eg, when pushing the SR-2 or SR-71A at max power, versus the Unex DNMA
series high power NICs. The Unex ones are much, much cleaner.
Adrian
On 1 August 2011 16:31, Alex Hacker
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:56 PM, pangyunong <029...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I'm very excited in the list. It's my first time to use a mailing
> list, so I'm afraid there are some impolite to you. If there, please
> tell me.
>
> I have some question about mailing list of ath9k.
> I want modify
Important exeption is the channel sidebands and baseband filters fall-off. You
sholdn't use adjacnt channels for different networks. At least 40MHz gap
should be left between H20 channels, and as much as 80MHz between HT40+ and
HT40- channels.
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:19:03AM +0600, Alex Hacker
10 matches
Mail list logo