I've also noticed that there's sometimes quite noticable differences in how "clean" the output is from various NICs.
Eg, when pushing the SR-2 or SR-71A at max power, versus the Unex DNMA series high power NICs. The Unex ones are much, much cleaner. Adrian On 1 August 2011 16:31, Alex Hacker <hac...@epn.ru> wrote: > Important exeption is the channel sidebands and baseband filters fall-off. You > sholdn't use adjacnt channels for different networks. At least 40MHz gap > should be left between H20 channels, and as much as 80MHz between HT40+ and > HT40- channels. > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:19:03AM +0600, Alex Hacker wrote: >> Really boys, it's unbelievable story! We works with Atheros based cards for >> years, our RF engenners have spectrum analyzers connected to these cards >> continuously. I'd just ask him - nobody never see any out of band >> interference >> from these cards except the pci-e carrier at 2.5 and 5.0 GHz. So I'm shure >> that >> the issue lies somewhere else, not in RF plane. >> About antennas. Of coarse any object in the anntenna near field causes a >> distortion of gain/directivity and SWR so that the system performance can >> degrade. Anyway passive antenna system can not be source of out of band >> interference. >> >> With best regrads, >> Alex. >> > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
