Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 15

2013-04-09 Thread Holger Schurig
Unrelated to what you hope for E-mail tips: a) don't quote everything, only relevant stuff b) don't reply to e-mail digests, a subject of Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 15 is, well sorry for that word, crap 2013/4/5 anil m r anil...@gmail.com hello, I am new to atheros

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Yes, WLAN_ACTIVE here is just both TX and RX activity. So if it were working, that would stay low. adrian ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-09 Thread sandeep suresh
Hello Mr.Adrian, Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules.   http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note According to this application note, for 2-wire

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi transmission in your particular scheme. adrian On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh sandeep.sur...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Mr.Adrian, Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the following 2-wire