any thoughts on this folk?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.com wrote:
According 802.11n standard, when using an A-MPDU, there is a PPDU duration
constraint of 10 ms. In ath9k, the function ath_tx_form_aggr in xmit.c
limits the duration of each A-MPDU to 4ms
According 802.11n standard, when using an A-MPDU, there is a PPDU duration
constraint of 10 ms. In ath9k, the function ath_tx_form_aggr in xmit.c
limits the duration of each A-MPDU to 4ms by computing the duration
corresponding to the intended rate to b used.
In my previous discussion on this
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Daniel Yingqiang Ma yma.c...@gmail.com wrote:
For the 1st question, it seems it's generated by the MAC layer. You
can check this function in mac80211/agg-rx.c:
ieee80211_send_addba_resp()
That function generates ADDBA resp which is related to session
management
Maybe /sys/kernel/debug/ath9k is already present. You may want to
reboot to fix it.
Yeah, it was due to the order of delete entry calls. I had included
one more debugfs u8 entry which was being deleted after the
directory's entry and thus not being deleted at all and on the next
run it would
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:51 +0530, Arun Govindan ar...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to bring up ath9k in AP mode with DWA-556 PCI-x card. I see
three options to compile and test ath9k:
1. Download
IMHO it makes sense to use half of the BAW for each of the queue entries
under those conditions.
Can you point where (which function(s)/file(s)) the two A-MPDU keeping logic
is implemented?
Thanks.
--
Rakesh
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
Am not sure if you received this previously?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.comwrote:
I am having trouble identifying what information is available to the
driver programmer? Is there a comprehensive document or something which
explains it, if so
I am having trouble identifying what information is available to the
driver programmer? Is there a comprehensive document or something which
explains it, if so is it available in public domain?
As far as rate control parameters are concerned, h/w expects the
rate code and maximum number of
Is RSSI a parameter to rate control algorithm? It seems like it is
mantaining RSSI state and everything but when it comes to making the
decision of what rate to choose, it does that purely by maximizing expected
throughput which is a function of PER.
Just curious, why the part of codes relating to
Do they represent change of directions during the development of rc.c
code?
I don't think I understand your question.
I mean, you develop the basic stuff to implement an algorithm and then end
up not using those parameters.
Well I stay away from it because IMHO its pretty convoluted.
/adhoc works well under non-HT mode only.
--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rakesh Kumar gopchand...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ad-hoc
To: hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com
Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 5:29
For what I recall from your previous discussion on this list, the answer is
NO, it does not support HT rates on adhoc mode. But I have used my ath9k
device on non-HT rates.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Luis,
I have a AR5008 NIC. it But does not work
Try
http://www.orbit-lab.org/kernel/compat-wireless-2.6-stable/v2.6.31/compat-wireless-2.6.31-rc4.tar.bz2
Luis
Okay, the mistake I was doing previously was not loading all the
pre-requisite modules before loading ath9k, namely rfkill and led_class but
now I did that and I also
So, I am using Ubuntu 8.10 (Kernel 2.6.27). I used compat-wireless to
upgrade my ath9k based device. I downloaded libnl (had already upgraded it
in Ubuntu, which I discovered later), Wireless-reg-db, Crda. Installed them.
Then I went after hostapd 0.6.9 and was successful in building and
No, its not something in the IEEE standard so such support won't likely
get merged into mac80211. You might be able to use MCS rates in ad-hoc
mode but if that's possible its just becuase we haven't fixed the code
paths to not allow for it.
Luis
Are you referring to Ad-hoc mode when
15 matches
Mail list logo
