Re: [ath9k-devel] tcpdump Data Rate 802.11n

2015-02-09 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
Pieter ROBYNS uhasselt.be> writes: > > > > > Hi Ashutosh, > My guess is that the rate control algorithm overrides your modifications somewhere in the code, since you mentioned that sometimes you get the results you expect. You could try fiddling with /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phyx/rc/fix

Re: [ath9k-devel] MAC Layer Retransmissions during the same TXOP

2014-10-18 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
Georgios Kyriakou nyu.edu> writes: > > Hey all, > I don't know if this is the best place to ask, thus I apologize in advance. > > Back in the day I was messing around with MadWifi and, if I remember properly, after a packet was transmitted if the sender did not receive an ACK in SIFS time af

Re: [ath9k-devel] Setting Backoff values

2014-07-24 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
According to the best of my knowledge, even in case of missing Acks, backoff window gets increased. On Thursday, July 24, 2014, Stratos Keranidis wrote: > Dear Adrian, > > We are running some tests to see how the frame transmission attempts evolve > in cases that the medium is used only by a si

Re: [ath9k-devel] How to lock AMPDU length at a specific value?

2014-01-22 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
yup, block-ack window limit appears to be the main culprit behind your reduced ampdu lengths. Check ath_tx_form_aggr, there is an if-condition specifically checking whether your are exceeding block-ack window or not. If your sending rate is quite high then increased lossess might trigger this c

Re: [ath9k-devel] Playing with queue sizes in ath9k

2014-01-13 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
Check the struct ath_txq. It's defined in ath9k.h. You might find it helpful ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] Infrastructure mode support for 5/10 Mhz channels

2013-12-07 Thread Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar
Sergey Ryazanov gmail.com> writes: > > 2013/11/29 Kamran Nishat gmail.com>: > > Hi, > Hi > > > Does anyone ever use used 5/10Mhz channel in infrastructure (AP/client) > > mode. If yes then can you tell me ur Atheros cards versions and rate control > > you used. > > > Few years ago, we tested

Re: [ath9k-devel] about ath9k single hop performance

2013-11-14 Thread Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar
think if I only disable the datalink retry (but keeping the block ack for rate control in 802.11). > >   > Do you think both work well? > >   > Marcus > > > 2013/11/13 Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar gmail.com> > marcus muffin gmail.com> writes: > > > >

Re: [ath9k-devel] about ath9k single hop performance

2013-11-12 Thread Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar
marcus muffin gmail.com> writes: > > Dear all, > I am trying to disable acknowledge in mac layer to improve udp performance of a 3-node network. (i.e. sender -> relay ( ap mode) -> receiver). all stations are ath9k + mac80211. > > For single wireless link (sender to ap or ap to receiver with

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR5416 Message in Message (MIM)

2013-07-04 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
Kamran Nishat gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi Do u know ar5416 does support Message in Message (MIM) in case of interfering signals Carrier Sense. MIM means  means if  a recv is looked on one packet and another packet is started coming with higher strength. many Atheros cards leave the weaker si

Re: [ath9k-devel] Setting Backoff values

2013-06-05 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
Ruwaifa Anwar gmail.com> writes: > > We tried changing backoff value range through this function in mac.c > > REG_WRITE(ah, AR_DLCL_IFS(q), > SM(cwMin, AR_D_LCL_IFS_CWMIN) | > SM(qi->tqi_cwmax, AR_D_LCL_IFS_CWMAX) | > SM(qi->tqi_aifs, AR_D_LCL_IFS_AIFS)); >

[ath9k-devel] Setting Backoff values

2013-06-05 Thread Ruwaifa Anwar
We tried changing backoff value range through this function in mac.c REG_WRITE(ah, AR_DLCL_IFS(q), SM(cwMin, AR_D_LCL_IFS_CWMIN) | SM(qi->tqi_cwmax, AR_D_LCL_IFS_CWMAX) | SM(qi->tqi_aifs, AR_D_LCL_IFS_AIFS)); Setting using 1,1 in place of cwMin and qi->tqi_cwmax respectively is giving almost the