If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the
former will be matched first and used instead of the latter.
Cc:
Cc:
Cc:
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta
---
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
> If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the
> former will be matched first and used instead of the latter.
>
> Cc:
> Cc:
> Cc:
> Cc:
> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta
Why? What kind of bug you are fixing? You are not really de
Hello,
On 04/10/2016 17:46:44 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>
>> If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the
>> former will be matched first and used instead of the latter.
>>
>> Cc:
>> Cc:
>> Cc:
>> Cc:
>> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambal
"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/10/2016 17:46:44 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>>
>>> If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the
>>> former will be matched first and used instead of the latter.
>>>
>>> Cc:
>>>
Hello,
On 12/10/2016 15:34:46 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 04/10/2016 17:46:44 CEST, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>>>
If generic entries are positioned above specific ones, then the
former will b
"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>>> So, after seeing that the rest of the file is sorted this way (generic
>>> section after the specific ones), I concluded that the 0x002A sorting
>>> was wrong in the first place, and so is 0x0029. Then I sent this patch
>>> to fix this.
>>
>> I can't se
Hello,
On 12/10/2016 17:01:08 CEST, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> "Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
>
So, after seeing that the rest of the file is sorted this way (generic
section after the specific ones), I concluded that the 0x002A sorting
was wrong in the first place, and so is 0x
"Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam)" writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/10/2016 17:01:08 CEST, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>
>> So to tell the full story I'll change the commit log to something like
>> below. Does it look ok to you?
>
> Yes; but I'd change "So" to "This turned out to be wrong", and add a note
> about
