Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2013-10-20 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Hi Vikranth, i was not able to reproduce your issue. For some time you have sended some kernel debug messages. Plase send kernel patch you used to get this result. Describe host configuration and kind of monitored traffik needed to reproduce it. Am 17.10.2013 15:31, schrieb vikranth reddy: Hi

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2013-10-17 Thread vikranth reddy
Hi Oleksij, Adrian Thanks for Reply. We are using Sony-UWA BR100 Adapter with AR7010+AR9280 chipset. We are using compat-wireless-3.6.8 in x86 machine with Intel Core i5. In monitor mode, we see for some packets the TSF difference is negative for consecutive captured packets, which confuses our

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2013-10-16 Thread vikranth reddy
Hi Adrian, List, We are still finding the same negative timestamp difference (between consecutive packets) issue with some of packets, with latest ath9_htc open-source firmware version. Adrian, Did you add this fix into open-source version of ath9k_htc firmware already? or still its not updated

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2013-10-16 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Hi Vikranth, i cant find detailed description of this problem. Can you please attach patches you use for debugging and information about your testing setup, hw, usb controller, etc. Please describe symptom of this problem, for example connection lost etc. Am 16.10.2013 12:19, schrieb vikranth

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2013-10-16 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Is this for aggregate frames? If it is, I _think_ aggregate frames only have a valid timestamp in the _last_ subframe. -adrian On 16 October 2013 08:11, Oleksij Rempel li...@rempel-privat.de wrote: Hi Vikranth, i can't find detailed description of this problem. Can you please

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-12-03 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 1 December 2012 06:31, Christian Lamparter chunk...@googlemail.com wrote: Please let me know if it works or doesn't work for you. Thanks! It seems to work/hold. Thanks! Can you please bump the version old: [ 26.106713] ath9k_htc 1-10:1.0: ath9k_htc: FW Version: 1.3 new:

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-12-03 Thread vikranth reddy
Hi Adrian, Sorry for delayed reply! Here the debug-logs are added only for the cases where there is negative time-difference, not for success case. Logs below, that you pointed out, are not from consecutive packets. Nov 29 10 36 49 [ 122.787519] ###now = 64609 prev = 2683598441314 diff

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-12-01 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Thursday 29 November 2012 00:50:59 Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi all, I've done an updated build of the ath9k_htc firmware images. I don't currently have a HTC setup working so this is just a recompilation of the current firmware. http://dev.qca.qualcomm.com/~adrian/htc/20121128/ Please

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-30 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. be64_to_cpu() ? That field is not already converted for you? Adrian On 29 November 2012 20:46, vikranth reddy vikranth.reddydevelo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have tested it using Sony BR-100 (AR7010 + AR9280). PFA the time diff logs for the new firmware.(htc_7010.fw) I added prints

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-30 Thread vikranth reddy
Hi Adrian, No its not already converted. See the below code-snippet in ath9k_rx_prepare rx_status-mactime = be64_to_cpu(rxbuf-rxstatus.rs_tstamp); rx_status-band = hw-conf.channel-band; rx_status-freq = hw-conf.channel-center_freq; rx_status-signal = rxbuf-rxstatus.rs_rssi +

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-30 Thread Adrian Chadd
As I said, the cozybit guys reported that the TSF increment is behaving correctly. Maybe it's only behaving correctly for beacons here, hm. Also, look: Nov 29 10 36 49 [ 122.787519] ###now = 64609 prev = 2683598441314 diff = -2683598376705 Nov 29 10 36 49 [ 122.947963] ###now

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-30 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Am 29.11.2012 00:50, schrieb Adrian Chadd: Hi all, I've done an updated build of the ath9k_htc firmware images. I don't currently have a HTC setup working so this is just a recompilation of the current firmware. http://dev.qca.qualcomm.com/~adrian/htc/20121128/ Please let me know if it

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-29 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 29 November 2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi all, I've done an updated build of the ath9k_htc firmware images. I don't currently have a HTC setup working so this is just a recompilation of the current firmware. http://dev.qca.qualcomm.com/~adrian/htc/20121128/ Please let me

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-29 Thread vikranth reddy
Hi, I have tested it using Sony BR-100 (AR7010 + AR9280). PFA the time diff logs for the new firmware.(htc_7010.fw) I added prints for time diff in file:- ~/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c function:- ath9k_rx_tasklet position:- just before ieee80211_rx function. *Code Snippet:*

[ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc test release: please test

2012-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, I've done an updated build of the ath9k_htc firmware images. I don't currently have a HTC setup working so this is just a recompilation of the current firmware. http://dev.qca.qualcomm.com/~adrian/htc/20121128/ Please let me know if it works or doesn't work for you. The specific two