Re: Feed History -04

2005-10-15 Thread Robert Sayre
On 10/15/05, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, but that still leaves us with the question below -- who's doing > the paging, and why is it useful to have multiple ways around the thing? James is 100% wrong :)... about last/first/top/head/bottom/hole-in-the-ground. There's no reas

Re: Feed History -04

2005-10-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
OK, but that still leaves us with the question below -- who's doing the paging, and why is it useful to have multiple ways around the thing? On 15/10/2005, at 7:25 PM, Eric Scheid wrote: On 16/10/05 6:54 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you walk me through a use cas

Re: Feed History -04

2005-10-15 Thread Eric Scheid
On 16/10/05 6:54 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Can you walk me through a use case where this would be desirable? >>> E.g. what would the subscription URI be, would any of the entries >>> be updated, and how if so? In what scenario would having a closed >>> set feed be use

Re: Feed History -04

2005-10-15 Thread Mark Nottingham
On 14/10/2005, at 10:24 PM, James M Snell wrote: My answer would be: if "last" is used, it's a closed set; if "last" is not used, it's an open set. Can you walk me through a use case where this would be desirable? E.g. what would the subscription URI be, would any of the entries be up