On 10/15/05, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, but that still leaves us with the question below -- who's doing > the paging, and why is it useful to have multiple ways around the thing?
James is 100% wrong :)... about last/first/top/head/bottom/hole-in-the-ground. There's no reason to specify these things in Mark's draft. If they prove useful in implementations, they can be layered on the existing specs. Mark has his next/prev turned around, IMHO. link rel=next should go deeper into the past. Think of how you would write a SQL query with a limit clause. Robert Sayre
