My first N3 representation of the example Service document, with 3
classes :Service, :Workspace, and :Collection
a :Service;
:workspace [ a :Workspace;
:title Main Site@en;
:primaryCollection [ a :Collection;
:title
Are linked feeds required to have unique atom:id values? Or, are they
required to have the same atom:id values?
That is, for instance:
!-- feed1.xml --
feed
idtag:example.org,2005:feed1/id
link rel=previous href=feed2.xml /
/feed
!-- feed2.xml --
feed
I think they should all have the same id. But I don't have any good
arguments in favor. It just seems to make sense that way.
Henry
On 10 Mar 2006, at 18:44, James M Snell wrote:
If the feeds have the same atom:id, I would submit that they form a
single logical feed. Meaning that all of
Friday, March 10, 2006, 5:44:21 PM, you wrote:
Are linked feeds required to have unique atom:id values? Or, are they
required to have the same atom:id values?
Thoughts?
The history spec frequently uses the phrase the feed in the
singular, this implies to me that the id's of the feeds must
On 10 Mar 2006, at 18:44, James M Snell wrote:
If the feeds have the same atom:id, I would submit that they form a
single logical feed. Meaning that all of the feed documents in an
incremental feed (using Mark's Feed History terminology) SHOULD use
the
same atom:id value. This is the way I
Yep. Good.. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't making any baseless
assumptions with this. sounds like I'm safe.
- James
Antone Roundy wrote:
On 10 Mar 2006, at 18:44, James M Snell wrote:
If the feeds have the same atom:id, I would submit that they form a
single logical feed. Meaning
