On 11/12/06 2:26 PM, "Joe Gregorio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding an optional parameter that indicated an entry or
> a feed would be a more elegant solution:
>
> application/atom+xml;type=entry
> application/atom+xml;type=feed
I certainly agree it would be more elegant.
A more pragmati
On 12/10/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only danger [of defining a new media type] is if someone has
implemented
APP per the moving target which is Draft-[n++] ... they should
revise their test implementations as the draft updates, and certainly
update once it reaches RFC status
