* Andreas Sewe wrote:
While RFC 2045 specifically allows quoted parameter values and defines
application/atom+xml;type=feed to be equivalent to
application/atom+xml;type=feed, RFC 4288 states that '[t]here is no
defined syntax for parameter values. Therefore registrations MUST
specify
While RFC 2045 specifically allows quoted parameter values and defines
application/atom+xml;type=feed to be equivalent to
application/atom+xml;type=feed, RFC 4288 states that '[t]here is no
defined syntax for parameter values. Therefore registrations MUST
specify parameter value syntax.'
On 1/19/07, Andreas Sewe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it looks like that quoting the type parameter's values is no
longer allowed;
Are the quotes part of the parameter value? Or, are quotes merely delimiters
of the value? If RFC045 is read to indicate that the quotes are delimiters,
then it
+1. The way I read it the quotes do not matter.
- James
Bob Wyman wrote:
On 1/19/07, *Andreas Sewe* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it looks like that quoting the type parameter's values is no
longer allowed;
Are the quotes part of the parameter value? Or, are quotes
FYI
--Lisa
Begin forwarded message:
From: The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 19, 2007 1:07:21 PM PST
To: IETF-Announce ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history (Feed
Paging and Archiving) to Proposed Standard
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
The IESG
