TED]
On Behalf Of 'A. Pagaltzis'
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:44 PM
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue
* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 20:55]:
>The only practice I'm advocating is that if I want my feed to be
>formatted in the
>* Sean Lyndersay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-09 17:05]:
>>To build on this idea, there is real value on a consistent view of
>>feeds for the user, helping the user understand what they are looking
>>at, and the context in which they can use the data. In fact, that's
>>part of the promise of
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-08 20:30]:
>>>I would call IE7 dropping xml-stylesheet directives a data lose
>>>issue.
>>
>> Neither desktop nor online aggregators (such as NetNewsWire and
>> Bloglines) have ev
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of A. Pagaltzis
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 AM
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue
* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-08 20:30]:
>I would call IE7 dropping xml-stylesheet dire
IE6 and FF render Atom/RSS feeds as html using the
xml-stylesheet directive, however, IE7 Beta 2 drops the feed's xml-stylesheet
directive, if one exists, and replacing with IE7's own stylesheet
containing the gray to blue gradient background with the MS RSS extensions for
navigation/collati
evangelizing this can be made known
to the broad, XML.com/OReillynet audience.
I'll ping back this list when its ready.
re: your XSLT PI problem with IE7. Is the code live somewhere that is
accessible such that I can take a look at it and help you debug the
problem?
On 2/26/06, James
Yenne
tylesheet"
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:10 PM, James Yenne wrote:
> My feeds contain a generic xml-stylesheet, which formats the feed for
> display along with a feed-specific css. Since xsl processors do not
> have a standard way to pass parameters to xsl stylesheets, I provide
> this fee
their
data feed subscriptions is to focus on those that have gone through the full
standardization process, and as such companys like MS can build solutions that
they know are going to be compliant in 6 month, 6 years, and beyond.
Thats both reassuring to them AND most importantly, your
d subscriptions is to focus on those that have gone through the full
standardization process, and as such companys like MS can build solutions that
they know are going to be compliant in 6 month, 6 years, and beyond.
Thats both reassuring to them AND most importantly, your site visitors.
an be
useful in entries also.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of A. Pagaltzis
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:43 PM
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Link rel attribute "stylesheet"
* James Yenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02
My feeds contain a
generic xml-stylesheet, which formats the feed for display along with a
feed-specific css. Since xsl processors do not have a standard way to pass
parameters to xsl stylesheets, I provide this feed-specific css to the xsl
processor in the feed as a link with rel="styleshe
I'm using the
feedvalidtor.org to validate a feed with entries containing atom:updated that
may have the same datetime, although different atom:id. The validator complains
that two entries cannot have the same value for atom:updated. I generate these
feeds and the generator uses the current
Thanks for your thoughtful analysis on the update issue.
I just want to follow up with reader implementers the importance of
supporting the Atom update mechanism. News is one large application of a
feed, but there are potentially many others in which the update mechanism is
a requirement.
For f
lf Of James Yenne
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:13 AM
To: 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: RE: Reader 'updated' semantics
I haven't used Sage, but I would anticipate that entries which have been
retrieved initially by a reader are continually chec
D]
On Behalf Of Stephane Bortzmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:35 AM
To: James Yenne
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Reader 'updated' semantics
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 07:06:59AM -0800, James Yenne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said:
> "RS
Monday, January 09, 2006 9:31 PM
To: James M Snell
Cc: James Yenne; atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Reader 'updated' semantics
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:08 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> The updated element is used to indicate when a significant update has
> occurred to the entry. If you
I'm looking for info about what
the expected 'updated' datetime element semantics look like, and haven't
found anything in old email and the wiki on this topic. Is there a description
somewhere? RSSBandit and FeedDemon don't pick up entry changes based on my
changing the feed and entry 'upd
17 matches
Mail list logo
