On 5/22/05, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe that the alternative of using an extension is inadequate due
> to these conditions. The conditions require tight coupling of the
> publishing process to the archiving process, which to me suggest that
> Atom is not really supporting
I thought it would be useful to give a use-case for
PaceAllowDuplicateIdsWithModified, so that arguments about the
validity of the use-case don't get mixed up with arguments about the
mechanics of the proposal.
The scenario is that an Atom publishing server wishes to allow
publishers to download
