On 20/07/2005, at 10:44 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
I was actually wondering why non-stateful feeds couldn't have
archives:
in the This month's Top 10 records feed, why couldn't I link to
Last
month's Top 10 records?
If this kind of links are not dealt within feed-history, then I
suggest
Antone Roundy wrote:
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
I was actually wondering why non-stateful feeds couldn't have
archives: in the This month's Top 10 records feed, why couldn't I
link to Last month's Top 10 records?
If this kind of links are not dealt
This mail has been around in my drafts folder for about 10 days, but
here it is...
I'm not sure what my position is wrt what I wrote below...
Mark Nottingham wrote:
On 04/07/2005, at 6:18 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
With the -01 draft (it might have been the same within the -00 one
too),
On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
I was actually wondering why non-stateful feeds couldn't have archives:
in the This month's Top 10 records feed, why couldn't I link to Last
month's Top 10 records?
If this kind of links are not dealt within feed-history, then I
Mark Nottingham wrote:
On 04/07/2005, at 6:18 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Really good work!
Thanks!
Why not using an xs:boolean for fh:stateful? hence allowing values 0,
1, true and false.
I did it this way because I'm not a huge XML Schema fan :)
At this point, stateful
Mark Nottingham wrote:
This draft is based on comments received; thanks to everyone. Major
changes;
* Removed 'this' link
* Changed link syntax
* Changed stateful syntax
* Clarified difference between 'subscription' and 'archive' feeds
(note that they're just for the purposes of clarity
