On May 19, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:
co-chair-mode
Paul and I consider that the following text has consensus support of
the WG and the editors are directed to include it in the format draft
(editorial judgment call on where to insert):
Some applications (one example is full-text
Some applications may choose to require a minimum amount of inline
text or (X)HTML data to function reliably and predictably. For that
reason, atom:entry elements are advised to contain a non-empty
atom:title element, a non-empty atom:summary element when the entry
contains no atom:content
On 5/19/05, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
co-chair-mode
Paul and I consider that the following text has consensus support of
the WG and the editors are directed to include it in the format draft
(editorial judgment call on where to insert):
Some applications (one example is full-text
/ Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| co-chair-mode
| Paul and I consider that the following text has consensus support of the WG
| and the editors are directed to include it in the format draft (editorial
| judgment call on where to insert):
|
| Some applications (one example is
Rephrasing slightly...
+ 1
--
Roger Benningfield
On 19 May 2005, at 2:07 pm, Tim Bray wrote:
Some applications (one example is full-text indexers) require a
minimum amount of text or (X)HTML to function reliably and
predictably. For that reason, it is advisable that each atom:entry
element contain a non-empty atom:title element, a
