Mark Pilgrim wrote:
On 5/19/05, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[atom:summary and accessibility]
Right now our draft says:
atom:entry elements MUST contain an atom:summary element in any of the
following cases:
...
- the atom:entry contains an atom:content that has a src attribute
(and is thus
Tim Bray wrote:
PaceTextShouldBeProvided
+1 from Ruby, explicit -1's from Sayre and de hÓra. However, taking
this and PaceOptionalSummary together, it seems clear that the WG
generally believes the following:
- Title-only feeds are OK for data where that's really all you have.
- Failing to
On 5/19/05, Isofarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd urge that the wording here should also include accessibility
concerns, especially to encourage accessible alternatives to to be
adopted when the content is known to be inaccessible - e.g. images,
sound files, movies, flash.
HTML for
