James M Snell wrote:
Bob Wyman wrote:
Andreas Sewe wrote:
So, it looks like that quoting the type parameter's values is no
longer allowed;
Are the quotes part of the parameter value? Or, are quotes merely
delimiters of the value? If RFC045 is read to indicate that the
quotes are
* Andreas Sewe wrote:
This raises the question, however, whether it would be worth pointing
out in the I-D that quoting a parameter value is allowed. Implementors
might otherwise produce code that does treat
application/atom+xml;type=feed and application/atom+xml;type=feed as
different.
* Andreas Sewe wrote:
While RFC 2045 specifically allows quoted parameter values and defines
application/atom+xml;type=feed to be equivalent to
application/atom+xml;type=feed, RFC 4288 states that '[t]here is no
defined syntax for parameter values. Therefore registrations MUST
specify
While RFC 2045 specifically allows quoted parameter values and defines
application/atom+xml;type=feed to be equivalent to
application/atom+xml;type=feed, RFC 4288 states that '[t]here is no
defined syntax for parameter values. Therefore registrations MUST
specify parameter value syntax.'
On 1/19/07, Andreas Sewe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it looks like that quoting the type parameter's values is no
longer allowed;
Are the quotes part of the parameter value? Or, are quotes merely delimiters
of the value? If RFC045 is read to indicate that the quotes are delimiters,
then it
+1. The way I read it the quotes do not matter.
- James
Bob Wyman wrote:
On 1/19/07, *Andreas Sewe* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it looks like that quoting the type parameter's values is no
longer allowed;
Are the quotes part of the parameter value? Or, are quotes
