Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-31 Thread Julian Reschke
Mark Nottingham wrote: And, if you use XSLT, it's also possible to do it all in-stylesheet, with or without links. Safari (and probably other things) don't do XSLT. Fair enough. Safari is said to get a (libxml-based) XSLT engine in the next major upgrade. Best regards, Julian -- green/bytes

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-31 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Robert Sayre wrote: If I tell NetNewsWire to GET something in the subscribe dialog, my dispatching instructions are clear. Everything is a feed. Making up rules for application/xml, text/xml, and application/octet-stream will require superceding some RFCs that I'd rather not mess with. What

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-31 Thread Robert Sayre
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * Robert Sayre wrote: If I tell NetNewsWire to GET something in the subscribe dialog, my dispatching instructions are clear. Everything is a feed. Making up rules for application/xml, text/xml, and application/octet-stream will require superceding some RFCs that I'd

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-31 Thread Robert Sayre
Sam Ruby wrote: Interoperability will be improved if we can nail down what are valid media types that atom feeds can be served with, and what are invalid media types that should always be rejected. We can build voluntary conformance test suites for aggregator developers to test against. The

atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-30 Thread Graham
On 31 Jan 2005, at 2:40 am, Mark Nottingham wrote: which is the same feed, but with atom:info replaced by a 'foo' element. Even better, you can drop foo and put the xhtml div as a direct child of feed. Then use feed div as the selector. And, if you use XSLT, it's also possible to do it all

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
On Jan 30, 2005, at 7:03 PM, Graham wrote: On 31 Jan 2005, at 2:40 am, Mark Nottingham wrote: which is the same feed, but with atom:info replaced by a 'foo' element. Even better, you can drop foo and put the xhtml div as a direct child of feed. Then use feed div as the selector. Nice! And, if

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-30 Thread Robert Sayre
Mark Nottingham wrote: So, the relevant question seems to be whether any browsers do something interesting with +xml media types; No, the relevant question is whether +xml media types can be reliably dispatched without any knowledge of a specific scheme. I don't know the answer, but I do know

Re: atom:info [was Re: Comments on format-05]

2005-01-30 Thread Mark Nottingham
RFC 3023, Section 7: This document recommends the use of a naming convention (a suffix of '+xml') for identifying XML-based MIME media types, whatever their particular content may represent. This allows the use of generic XML processors and technologies on a wide variety of different