> On May 10, 2016, at 05:48, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2016 07:38 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
>>> On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>>>
>>> - /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
>>
> On May 9, 2016, at 07:54, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> - /usr/bin/docker is a script which execs /usr/bin/docker-current (v1.9) or
> /usr/bin/docker-latest (v1.10) based on what $DOCKERBINARY is set to.
Too late (or wrong forum?) perhaps, but this split is very distressing to me as
an end-us
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 11:47, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> On 07/27/2015 02:42 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
>>
>> If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the
>> equivalent of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it. Otherwise
The conntrack command from conntrack-tools is needed to for the
least-disruptive work-around for Docker bug 8795.
See: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/8795
If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the equivalent
of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it. Oth
