Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host 7.1910 Available for Download

2019-11-25 Thread Scott McCarty
All, Sorry about the crossed wires. I SWEAR I responded to the right thread and GMail sent this on the next thread up (off by one errors?) :-) On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:15 AM Scott McCarty wrote: > Katie, > No worries. I am just nursing this along because it's on my list. I

Re: [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic Host 7.1910 Available for Download

2019-11-22 Thread Scott McCarty
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel) > mailing list. > > Have questions about using Atomic? See the > [atomic](https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic) > mailing list or find us in the #atomic channel on Freenode. > > > -- > Jason Brooks

Re: [atomic-devel] Getting to full deprecation of the projectatomic/ Github organization

2019-10-01 Thread Scott McCarty
; > > > so my question is short: > > > > - is there any high level overview of a private containerized system > > using rh's tool in the next few year? > > - is there any plan about it? > > - is it public? can someone share it with us? > > - is there a

Re: [atomic-devel] moby-engine for centos/epel

2019-05-06 Thread Scott McCarty
Oh, and forgot, would like to see it in EPEL for reasons that you will likely see this week :-) On Mon, May 6, 2019, 11:28 AM Scott McCarty wrote: > Neal, > Yeah, we will not port to RHEL (no ans at all), but to get moby-engine > working on CentOS should be just stealing the Fe

Re: [atomic-devel] moby-engine for centos/epel

2019-05-06 Thread Scott McCarty
Neal, Yeah, we will not port to RHEL (no ans at all), but to get moby-engine working on CentOS should be just stealing the Fedora spec file and doing a little work... On Mon, May 6, 2019, 10:57 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:52 AM Scott McCarty wrote: > > &g

Re: [atomic-devel] moby-engine for centos/epel

2019-05-06 Thread Scott McCarty
Muayyad & Neal, That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the feedback. It might sound crazy but I am keeping a list of every use case I can find and tracking our progress with podman. All of these use cases make sense (and I plan on tracking them in my list when I get back to a computer). If I

Re: [atomic-devel] moby-engine for centos/epel

2019-05-05 Thread Scott McCarty
gt; > Hi, >> > >> > it seems that fedora had shipped moby-engine, >> > when can we ship it for centos/epel? >> > >> > if not in epel,link for that repo? >> >> I think this is up to a volunteer to take it on. >> >> >> BTW

Re: [atomic-devel] recommended way of running a container

2019-05-02 Thread Scott McCarty
I assume by "atomic host" you mean a standalone, non-clustered, aka non-Kubernetes environment? On Thu, May 2, 2019, 4:12 PM Farkas Levente wrote: > Hi, > I'm just read the blog about healthchecks: > > > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/04/18/monitoring-container-vitality-and-availability

Re: [atomic-devel] Install CRI-O on Atomic Host

2019-01-29 Thread Scott McCarty
6:44 > rpm-md repo 'extras' (cached); generated: 2018-12-10 16:00:03 > Importing metadata [=] 100% > error: No package matches 'cri-o' > > Is there any other ways I can get CRI-O running on Atomic Host? and/or is > it planned to be also available on A

Re: [atomic-devel] What is the current state of the container tools

2018-07-12 Thread Scott McCarty
Farkas, Also, here is a brand new on off the press by Ben Breard: https://rhelblog.redhat.com/2018/07/11/unleash-powerful-linux-container-building-capabilities-with-buildah/ Best Regards Scott M On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:14 AM Scott McCarty wrote: > Farkas, > Here ar

Re: [atomic-devel] What is the current state of the container tools

2018-07-12 Thread Scott McCarty
ntended for enterprise distributions of Linux 3. Can't ship Docker EE because that requires a contract with Docker Inc. I would encourage you to keep checking out the OCI Container Tools, or perhaps go download Docker CE Hopefully that helps... > > Thanks in advance. > > -- &

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

2018-05-30 Thread Scott McCarty
On 05/26/2018 06:50 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 05/25/2018 04:34 PM, Scott McCarty wrote: Shane,     I see nobody has responded. To be honest, I read your email three times, and I can't quite figure out your use case. I am guessing others may be heads down working on the new Red Hat C

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic as Base OS for Standalone Appliance

2018-05-25 Thread Scott McCarty
eceived this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message, its attachments and any copies thereof. -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http:

Re: [atomic-devel] Additional Discussion about the Future of Atomic Host + Container Linux

2018-05-16 Thread Scott McCarty
see if some (or all) of your questions are addressed there. Thanks! -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multiple containers? http://red.ht/22xKw9i

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup (need reviewers)

2018-03-15 Thread Scott McCarty
t; doc for FAH/CAH, but I can't commit to putting in the time it would require to write it, since I'm not sure who the target user for it is. Someone who wants something "production" is going to install Origin, no? -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Red Hat OSAS -- Scot

Re: [atomic-devel] Kubernetes manual setup (need reviewers)

2018-03-15 Thread Scott McCarty
since I'm not sure who the target user for it is. Someone who wants something "production" is going to install Origin, no? -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Red Hat OSAS -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone:

Re: [atomic-devel] Atomic BOF at RH Summit

2018-02-16 Thread Scott McCarty
LOVE to talk to them directly. I am just a sales & marketing shill ;-) -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multiple co

Re: [atomic-devel] DevConf Project Atomic BOF - giving a 2 minutes presentation?

2017-12-21 Thread Scott McCarty
holidays, Sanja -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multiple containers? http://red.ht/22xKw9i

Re: [atomic-devel] Who got accepted to Kubecon?

2017-09-29 Thread Scott McCarty
asses for the conference. -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multiple containers? http://red.ht/22xKw9i

Re: [atomic-devel] Openshift Origin + CRI-O

2017-05-16 Thread Scott McCarty
me. Love, love, love this demo. Scheduled a tweet to go out. Keep your eyes peeled ;-) -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multi

Re: [atomic-devel] Need Advice: Container Internals Lab

2017-05-15 Thread Scott McCarty
On 05/15/2017 09:06 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 05/15/2017 08:59 AM, Scott McCarty wrote: On 05/15/2017 08:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: I would encourage you to make this image "timeless". For the lab we did at summit someone could theoretically download the qcow2 years from now and

Re: [atomic-devel] Need Advice: Container Internals Lab

2017-05-15 Thread Scott McCarty
On 05/15/2017 08:28 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 05/15/2017 07:55 AM, Scott McCarty wrote: All, So, I need some advice. I know that everybody has an opinion on this kind of thing, but I really do need some ideas. I am working on building some kind of environment that people can download

[atomic-devel] Need Advice: Container Internals Lab

2017-05-15 Thread Scott McCarty
[1]: https://github.com/fatherlinux/container-internals-lab Best Regards Scott M -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into mul

Re: [atomic-devel] Moving to atomic-workstation

2017-04-25 Thread Scott McCarty
here's activity on upstreaming this into Fedora. -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your application into multiple containers? http://red.ht/22xKw9i

[atomic-devel] Fwd: Devops Weekly #324

2017-04-03 Thread Scott McCarty
Interesting. Targeting this use case without the docker daemon could be tricky right? Tools = Ctop is a top-like interface for container metrics, connecting to a Docker socket and presenting information about container memory, CPU and network usage. https://bcicen.github.io/ctop/ https://

Re: [atomic-devel] Has anyone considered packaging dumb-init or tini for use in Fedora/CentOS/RHEL?

2017-03-06 Thread Scott McCarty
nal proxy. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Scott McCarty mailto:smcca...@redhat.com>> wrote: I am skeptical of any "resource" argument against systemd. Are you seeing some actually impact to performance that is causing problems? As for unit files, they

Re: [atomic-devel] Has anyone considered packaging dumb-init or tini for use in Fedora/CentOS/RHEL?

2017-03-06 Thread Scott McCarty
tem. It's a signal proxy. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Scott McCarty <mailto:smcca...@redhat.com>> wrote: I am skeptical of any "resource" argument against systemd. Are you seeing some actually impact to performance that is causing problems? As for unit

Re: [atomic-devel] Has anyone considered packaging dumb-init or tini for use in Fedora/CentOS/RHEL?

2017-03-06 Thread Scott McCarty
hat needs to reap > processes. I don't know that one or the other matters, I have a > slight bias for dumb-init in terms of signal rewriting (a few cases > might need that). > > Anyone using these today? What does dumb-init or tini get me that systemd does

Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub

2017-01-12 Thread Scott McCarty
that helps! Thanks, Jerry - Original Message - From: "Scott McCarty" To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 8:59:36 AM Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub Dumb question. Are these CentOS/Fedora images? Not

Re: [atomic-devel] System container images in projectatomic docker hub

2017-01-12 Thread Scott McCarty
up at the registry Randy Barlow is working on, and also pushed to Docker Hub as part of that process. -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: smcca...@redhat.com Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com When should you split your applic