On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
>
>> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote:
>>> Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion.
>>> We're getting ready to release our fi
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote:
>> Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion. We're
>> getting ready to release our first 2 week atomic update on Tuesday and Dusty
>> Mabe has raised 2
On 13.11.2015 17:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote:
>> Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion. We're
>> getting ready to release our first 2 week atomic update on Tuesday and Dusty
>> Mabe has raised 2 potential relea
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote:
> Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion. We're
> getting ready to release our first 2 week atomic update on Tuesday and Dusty
> Mabe has raised 2 potential release blockers that were not part of automated
> t
Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion. We're
getting ready to release our first 2 week atomic update on Tuesday and Dusty
Mabe has raised 2 potential release blockers that were not part of automated
testing. It's good that he caught them, but it's also a bit of a
