Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again Fixed for me

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:23:06PM -0300, Rick wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > If this happens after you start the local client, you know that the > > issue is there. If this happens w/o starting the local client then you > > have some phantom client somehwere ... > > > It is happening w/o starti

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again Fixed for me

2006-10-05 Thread Rick
Axel Thimm wrote: > If this happens after you start the local client, you know that the > issue is there. If this happens w/o starting the local client then you > have some phantom client somehwere ... > It is happening w/o starting the local client or any remote frontend clients. So I have a

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythcommflag and mythtranscode in mythtv-frontend, not mythtv-backend?

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:55:21AM -0700, Joe Votour wrote: > > > > That's dumb, of course. Looking at the %files section I see even more > > stuff that needs to move from frontened to backend. > > > > Care to take up the task to make a better file distribution within > > mythtv? For some binaries/

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythcommflag and mythtranscode in mythtv-frontend, not mythtv-backend?

2006-10-05 Thread Joe Votour
> > That's dumb, of course. Looking at the %files section I see even more > stuff that needs to move from frontened to backend. > > Care to take up the task to make a better file distribution within > mythtv? For some binaries/files one would need to ask the mythtv > developers. > -- > Axel.Thimm a

Re: [ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote: >> Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving >> the following >> >> error: Failed Dependencies: >>libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . >> >> But Pilot Link is already in

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again

2006-10-05 Thread Mark Wormgoor
Nick wrote: > On 05/10/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:34:36PM -0300, Rick wrote: >>> Can somebody run through these files and my explanation and see if there is something missing or something I'm doing wrong. I have two frontends >

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again

2006-10-05 Thread Nick
On 05/10/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:34:36PM -0300, Rick wrote: > > > >> Can somebody run through these files and my explanation and see if there > >> is something missing or something I'm doing wrong. I have two frontends > >> and a combi

Re: [ATrpms-users] alsa update for fc5 problems

2006-10-05 Thread Jeff Guerdat
Bug entered: https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2505 Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:48:48AM -0400, Jeff Guerdat wrote: >> Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:36:54AM -0400, Jeff Guerdat wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:32:04AM -0300, Rick wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:34:36PM -0300, Rick wrote: > > > >> Can somebody run through these files and my explanation and see if there > >> is something missing or something I'm doing wrong. I have two frontends >

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again

2006-10-05 Thread Rick
Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:34:36PM -0300, Rick wrote: > >> Can somebody run through these files and my explanation and see if there >> is something missing or something I'm doing wrong. I have two frontends >> and a combined frontend/backend. The two separate frontends bot

Re: [ATrpms-users] Intel Pro/Wireless 3945 without monitor mode

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:10PM +0200, Toni Cambra wrote: > I've used the atrpms packages for making my Intel Corporation > PRO/Wireless 3945ABG work and it's fine, but as far I'm concerned, the > drivers (ipw3945) seems not to have been compiled allowing monitor mode, > which is not available b

Re: [ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote: > Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving > the following > > error: Failed Dependencies: >libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . > > But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 i

Re: [ATrpms-users] Protocol on mythtv again

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:34:36PM -0300, Rick wrote: > Can somebody run through these files and my explanation and see if there > is something missing or something I'm doing wrong. I have two frontends > and a combined frontend/backend. The two separate frontends both show as > running protoco

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythcommflag and mythtranscode in mythtv-frontend, not mythtv-backend?

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:35:49PM -0700, Joe Votour wrote: > This time when I installed MythTV from RPMs (I've been running SVN for > quite a while due to needing a custom patch from early in the 0.20 SVN > cycle) I noticed something that I think is strange. > > Rather than installing "mythtv-sui