[ATrpms-users] dahdi kmdl for F12

2009-11-24 Thread William M. Brack
Axel, Is it likely there will be a dahdi-linux-kmdl-2.6.31.5-127.fc12 in the near future? I made the mistake of upgrading my Asterisk server to F12 without even thinking about it :-(. Bill ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users@atrpms.net http://l

Re: [ATrpms-users] NuvExport

2009-11-24 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:37 PM, DISAFAN wrote: > The recent updates to the ffmpeg package have broken nuvexport again. I've > made some amendments, and wanted to share them in case anyone else is having > trouble. > > The detection of installed codecs is now failing because a list of codecs > d

[ATrpms-users] mencoder still doesn't do x264

2009-11-24 Thread john bray
axel - i checked the new version of mplayer. as you said we must have gotten to mplayer in a small timewarp. :-D thanks for your packaging efforts. i tested the new version of mencoder and it still doesn't have the x264 support in it. it complains thus: Exiting... (error parsing command line

Re: [ATrpms-users] New NVIDIA Legacy Drivers for X Server 1.7

2009-11-24 Thread John Pilkington
John Pilkington wrote: Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:23:05PM -0500, John Welch wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:37 PM, John Welch wrote: NVIDIA recently released new legacy drivers for the 173.xx and 96.xx series with support for X Server 1.7. These releases seem to kind

[ATrpms-users] libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at is needed by libsndfile-devel-1.0.16-8.RHL5.i386

2009-11-24 Thread Ron Arts
Hi, I am building a lot of rpm's from the atrpms repo myzelf on a couple of fresh CentOS 5.4 machines. I meant them all to be the same, but apparently they aren't. Now on both machines I can build libsndfile, and on one machine I can install the resulting rpms, but on the other one I get the abo

[ATrpms-users] ffmpeg broken for x264?

2009-11-24 Thread Bryan Moffit
After the latest update, unable to encode x264 with ffmpeg. Name : ffmpeg Arch : i586 Version: 0.5 Release: 31_git20091120.fc11 Name : libx264_79 Arch : i586 Version: 0.79 Release: 11_20091119.2245.fc11 Message from ffmpeg (using the same command line argu

Re: [ATrpms-users] mencoder still doesn't do x264

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:34:58AM -0600, john bray wrote: > axel - > > i checked the new version of mplayer. as you said we must have gotten > to mplayer in a small timewarp. :-D thanks for your packaging efforts. > > i tested the new version of mencoder and it still doesn't have the x26

Re: [ATrpms-users] New NVIDIA Legacy Drivers for X Server 1.7

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:26:20PM +, John Pilkington wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:23:05PM -0500, John Welch wrote: > >>On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:37 PM, John Welch wrote: > >>>NVIDIA recently released new legacy drivers for the 173.xx and 96.xx series > >

Re: [ATrpms-users] libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at is needed by libsndfile-devel-1.0.16-8.RHL5.i386

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:02:48PM +0100, Ron Arts wrote: > I am building a lot of rpm's from the atrpms repo myzelf on a couple > of fresh CentOS 5.4 machines. I meant them all to be the same, but > apparently they aren't. > > Now on both machines I can build libsndfile, and on one machine >

Re: [ATrpms-users] ffmpeg broken for x264?

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Bryan Moffit wrote: > After the latest update, unable to encode x264 with ffmpeg. > > Name : ffmpeg > Arch : i586 > Version: 0.5 > Release: 31_git20091120.fc11 > > Name : libx264_79 > Arch : i586 > Version: 0.79 > Relea

Re: [ATrpms-users] libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at is needed by libsndfile-devel-1.0.16-8.RHL5.i386

2009-11-24 Thread Ron Arts
Axel, I don't think so. Look at the error message. libsndfile-devel requires libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at . See the 'at' at the end? The libsndfile-devel rpm that I generate on one system requires that, the other one doesn't. Ron Axel Thimm schreef: Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:02:48PM +0100

[ATrpms-users] building gsm rpms fails: can't find some manpages. find-devel.sh to blame?

2009-11-24 Thread Ron Arts
Using gsm-1.0.13-2.src.rpm to rebuild the rpms fails: RPM build errors: InstallSourcePackage: Header V4 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b File not found: /var/tmp/gsm-1.0.13-2.RHL5-root-nnrelman/usr/share/man/man3/gsm.3 File not found: /var/tmp/gsm-1.0.13-2.RHL5-root-nnrelman/us

Re: [ATrpms-users] ffmpeg broken for x264?

2009-11-24 Thread Bryan Moffit
Right. Looks like the video presets had changed for x264. Everything works as usual if I add a -vpre default Thanks for your help. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Bryan Moffit wrote: >> After the latest update, unable to encode x

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread Gabe Rubin
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Wrt to upgrading: I already upgrade a couple of systems to F12. Fedora > 12 has been "released" in non-DVD form, e.g. /Everything/ and > /updates/ is already working, you can have F12 on you system with a > yum upgrade today! (And it works ra

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread Paul
On 25/11/2009 1:52 PM, Gabe Rubin wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: Wrt to upgrading: I already upgrade a couple of systems to F12. Fedora 12 has been "released" in non-DVD form, e.g. /Everything/ and /updates/ is already working, you can have F12 on you system with a y

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gabe Rubin wrote: > 2) Can I safely do this going from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 (i.e., > skipping Fedora 11)? No. "It is not possible to update directly from Fedora 10 or earlier with yum. To upgrade from Fedora 10, first update to Fedora 11, and then upgrade from

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread Paul
On 25/11/2009 2:21 PM, David Rees wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gabe Rubin wrote: 2) Can I safely do this going from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 (i.e., skipping Fedora 11)? No. "It is not possible to update directly from Fedora 10 or earlier with yum. To upgrade from Fedora 10, first up

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Paul wrote: > On 25/11/2009 2:21 PM, David Rees wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gabe Rubin wrote: >>> >>> 2) Can I safely do this going from Fedora 10 to Fedora 12 (i.e., >>> skipping Fedora 11)? >> >> No. >> >> "It is not possible to update directly

Re: [ATrpms-users] libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at is needed by libsndfile-devel-1.0.16-8.RHL5.i386

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:25:53PM +0100, Ron Arts wrote: > Axel, > > I don't think so. Look at the error message. libsndfile-devel > requires libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at . See the 'at' at the end? > > The libsndfile-devel rpm that I generate on one system requires > that, the other one doesn't. I

Re: [ATrpms-users] building gsm rpms fails: can't find some manpages. find-devel.sh to blame?

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:31:56PM +0100, Ron Arts wrote: > Using gsm-1.0.13-2.src.rpm to rebuild the rpms fails: > > RPM build errors: > InstallSourcePackage: Header V4 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b > File not found: > /var/tmp/gsm-1.0.13-2.RHL5-root-nnrelman/usr/share/man/man3/g

Re: [ATrpms-users] ffmpeg broken for x264?

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:26:48PM -0500, Bryan Moffit wrote: > Right. Looks like the video presets had changed for x264. Everything > works as usual if I add a > -vpre default Hm, that's what one would expect out of the box. Does that sound like a bug in ffmpeg? Would you like to report

Re: [ATrpms-users] How much longer for fedora 10?

2009-11-24 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:52:45PM -0800, Gabe Rubin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > Wrt to upgrading: I already upgrade a couple of systems to F12. Fedora > > 12 has been "released" in non-DVD form, e.g. /Everything/ and > > /updates/ is already working, you c

[ATrpms-users] IEEE1394 in Fedora 12 - no kmdl?

2009-11-24 Thread Fedor Pikus
There is an "ieee1394" package on ATRPMs but it appears to be not installable: it's missing the kmdl package. Should there be one? -- Fedor G Pikus (fpi...@gmail.com) http://www.pikus.net http://wild-light.com ___ atrpms-users mailing list atrpms-users