Re: [ATrpms-users] mythbackend starting before mySQLd

2012-09-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, The Walters wrote: > I ran into this before and found where someone said just include a delay in > the mythbackend startup script (edit > /etc/rc.d/init.d/mythbackend and change/add: sleep ## <-- number of seconds 5 > - 10 works), that has been working for me. > > # daemon

[ATrpms-users] Mythtv 0.26 for Fedora 17 x64 ?

2013-01-19 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
It seems there still aren't Mythtv 0.26 pacakges fro Fedora 17 x64 available. I see posts about this back in Oct. Axel -- can we kick the build server to make those ? == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Inter

[ATrpms-users] Just updated Myth/lirc from atrpms, and remote stoped working

2008-05-29 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
Atrpms has new updates to myth dated today. I just updated my Fedora 8 / Mythtv 0.21 system from atrpms, which also installed an lirc update to 77_cvs20080528.fc8. My system uses a homebrew serial IR connection. After the update, Mythtv is no longer responding to remote codes. However, ircat s

Re: [ATrpms-users] Just updated Myth/lirc from atrpms, and remote stoped working

2008-05-30 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > The version of lirc which is broken is the x86_64. Either F8 or F9. > liblirc_client0 and lirc-devel rpms are empty (size of 5.4 KB instead of > 17KB). 2A> > The i386 version seems to be fine (but I do not use i386). The original problem I reported

Re: [ATrpms-users] Creating virtual ISO file...

2008-09-03 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > > dd if=/dev/where_the_bluray_is of=file.iso > But here you ripping the whole disk ; it requires up to 50GB of disk > space and also takes forever (up to 2 hours). How about something like ln -s /dev/where_the_bluray_is /home/exports/file.iso Th

Re: [ATrpms-users] Would it be possible to give a warning before you wipe out the Fedora8 atrpms

2008-11-07 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
To add my $.02 : I see the situation with Fedora 8 being different, only because of the legacy nvidia driver situation. Fedora 9 included a pre-release X server. As far as I know there still are not legacy Nvidia drivers that work with Fedora 9. Only because of this I would ask that ATrpms s

Re: [ATrpms-users] Would it be possible to give a warning before you wipe out the Fedora8 atrpms

2008-11-07 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, David Rees wrote: > Two legacy versions of the Nvidia drivers for you. They may be on the repo, but they don't work. Nvidia has not released a patch yet. == Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162 WestNe

Re: [ATrpms-users] Would it be possible to give a warning before you wipe out the Fedora8 atrpms

2008-11-11 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:27:11PM -0500, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > > They may be on the repo, but they don't work. Nvidia has not released a > > patch yet. > > They have, but it's labeled beta. So on ATrpms you

[ATrpms-users] nvidia kmdl's gone ?

2008-12-11 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
I just upgraded my desktop from fc8 to fc10, went to update the nvidia-graphics packages from and started receiving errors that makes it look like the kernels are missing . Is something going on here ? == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westne

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia kmdl's gone ?

2008-12-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > > I just upgraded my desktop from fc8 to fc10, went to update the > nvidia-graphics packages from and started receiving errors that makes it > look like the kernels are missing . > > Is something going on here ? J

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia kmdl's gone ?

2008-12-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > Just to add, when I attempt to upgrade I get a failed dependancy, so it is > looking for the kmdl package: > > > Error: Missing Dependency: nvidia-graphics177.80-kmdl-1:177.80-103.1.fc10 is > needed by package 1:nvi

Re: [ATrpms-users] Nvidia Graphics Missing kmdl

2008-12-15 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Roy Lofthouse wrote: > I'm trying to install the 173.14.12 Nvidia drivers but I'm getting a > missing kmdl error. I can't see any kmdl files for any nvidia driver > when I do a search.. I asked this question last week and didn't get an answer. I ended up installing the driv

[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics meta package out of date ?

2009-01-09 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
"list avail nvidia*' shows updated nvidia-graphics177 packages available, but "yum update" doesn't install them. I think it is because the meta pacakge nvidia-graphics is still at version 2:177.80-29 , however nvidia-graphics177 shows version 1:177.82-104.fc10 is available. ==

[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics96 kmdl for 2.6.30

2009-09-09 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
I see the F11 nvidia-graphics kmdl for 2.6.30 has is on the repo for 180 and 185 , but not for nvidia-graphics96 . Is there a problem with it, or is it just not made yet ? == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics96 kmdl for 2.6.30

2009-09-11 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Axel Thimm wrote: > nvidia-graphics96.43.11 doesn't build on 2.6.30. Perhaps the > beta/pre-release does. 96.43.13 was released July 1, 2009 == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Internet Se

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics96 kmdl for 2.6.30

2009-09-11 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Axel Thimm wrote: > I have been building new (pre?)release packages all day now and they > will soon be uploaded. Thanks ! == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Internet Services of Westches

[ATrpms-users] Push new nvidia drivers please ?

2009-12-10 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
Axel - I've just upgraded a machine from FC11 to FC 12, and it seems there is no package for the current kernel. There have been some fast kernel releases in the past few days. Currently the only kernel for download is 2.6.31.6-166 Looks like you just updated, but (for the nvidia-graphics96

Re: [ATrpms-users] Videolan aquired by RealNetworks

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > http://www.videolan.org/ > > " > VideoLAN is proud to announce that it has been acquired by RealNetworks, the > There cannot be anything good coming out of this You didn't read the date on the announcement, did you ? =

Re: [ATrpms-users] Droid font for MythTV

2010-04-23 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, John Pilkington wrote: > The default font for the MythCenter and MythCenter-wide themes is Droid Sans - > see this from Daniel K > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/430646#430646 > > but I don't think it's in the ATrpms packages. I got it from > > http://a

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv 0.23

2010-04-27 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Axel Thimm wrote: > So 0.23 is hitting the stable repo. As with any mythtv release there > will be some breakage in the beginning and fixes will soon catch > up. If you are worried about early adoption either don't upgrade or > keep a backup of your database. For what it's wo

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv 0.23

2010-04-28 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Phill Edwards wrote: > Out of interest, why do you need to do the mythtv-setup step? Are > there some setup changes that have to be made for 0.23? Running mythtv-setup upgrades the database schema == Chris Candreva --

[ATrpms-users] Fedora 12 update re-installs libmyth* packages

2010-08-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
Just a warning, a standard "yum update" for 0.23 to 0.23.1 for some reason doesn't upgrade the libmyth* packages, instead it installed the new versions "for dependancies" after the upgrade I had to to a "yum remove libmyth*-0.23_*" == Ch

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.24 x86_64?

2010-12-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Jonathan Martens wrote: > On 1-12-2010 21:25, Axel Thimm wrote: > > OK, fixed, and if you update now against testing you'll get mythtv 0.24 > > along with qt 4.7.1. Make sure you have a mythdb backup. > > Any chances there will be a x86_64 version of MythTV 0.24? Now there is

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.24 x86_64?

2010-12-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Jonathan Martens wrote: > > I've install Myth 0.24 x86_64 from atrpms on 2 machines so far. > > And you are sure that is for EL5 (which I forgot to mention)? Nope, Fedora 14. Sorry. == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.24 x86_64?

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Blammo wrote: > There is a package called mythtv-backend, doesn't this fit the bill? At least right now I don't think so. I found out the hard way that the mythtv-backend actually DOES need to be installed on a frontend, because it contains the metadata grabber scripts

[ATrpms-users] Beta Nvidia driver for Fedora 15 ?

2011-04-29 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
Would it be possible to make a packge of the Nvidia 270 beta driver for Fedora 15 ? The current release driver doesn't work with Fedora 15. == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester h

Re: [ATrpms-users] Beta Nvidia driver for Fedora 15 ?

2011-05-04 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 11:36 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > > Would it be possible to make a packge of the Nvidia 270 beta driver for > > Fedora 15 ? The current release driver doesn't work with Fedora 15. > > OK, it&

Re: [ATrpms-users] VDPAU still broken with rev 271

2011-05-06 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 6 May 2011, O&M Ugarcina wrote: > Yes I posted the info in a bug on the mythtv trac . However my bug was > deemed a duplicate of bug 9344 , and closed . So I have been updating the > second bug ( 9344) with my observations . I just got an email from mythtv > to stop adding comments . So

Re: [ATrpms-users] Beta Nvidia driver for Fedora 15 ?

2011-05-10 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Axel Thimm wrote: > I did that, and redid it for 2.6.38.5-24.fc15 :) Just noticed, thanks ! == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/ ___

[ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics173 FC13 only avail for non-existant kernel ?

2011-06-10 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
In the FC13 repo, the latest available kernel is 2.6.34.8-68.fc13, but the currently available nvidia-graphics173 kmdl is kmdl-2.6.34.9-69.fc13 Am I only seeing screwy repos, or did Fedora roll back the kernel ? == Chris Candreva -- ch..

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics173 FC13 only avail for non-existant kernel ?

2011-06-15 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Axel Thimm wrote: > All current F13 kernels should be supported now. :) I'm still not seeing a kernel-2.6.34.9-69, while ATrpms wants to install a nvidia-graphics173.14.30-kmdl-2.6.34.9-69.fc13-173.14.30-111.fc13.i686 package There are kmdls for 2.6.34.8-68 for 173.14.28

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia drivers ver 275

2011-06-24 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, The Walters > wrote: > It was the nvidia.conf.backup file.  For some reason that was > being read (kept getting the boot warnings about it).  Once I > > A long time ago, I suggested to move the backup fi

Re: [ATrpms-users] new nvidia drivers ver 275

2011-06-24 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > A long time ago, I suggested to move the backup file to /tmp > > Which would make it disappear on reboot if it's a tmpfs file system. > > /tmp is not wiped out on each reboot. Files stay there for quite some time. Unless as I said it's ramdisk (

[ATrpms-users] After yum update, all myth programs segfaulting

2011-12-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
I ran "yum update" on my Fedora 15 myth backed Tues night. It seems something there has messed up mythtv, because I notice this morning that I only had 12 days of guide data. mythfilldatabase was segfaulting. Stupid me tried to fix it by rebooting, thinking there was a library conflict with s

Re: [ATrpms-users] After yum update, all myth programs segfaulting

2011-12-01 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, John Pilkington wrote: > On 01/12/11 13:45, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > > > > I ran "yum update" on my Fedora 15 myth backed Tues night. It seems > > something there has messed up mythtv, because I notice this morning that I >

[ATrpms-users] New Fedora 15 kernel, please rebuild nvidia kmdls ?

2011-12-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
yum just installed a new kernel, 2.6.41.4-1.fc15 . Axel, could you run the kmdl builds please ? Thanks ! -Chris == Chris Candreva -- ch...@westnet.com -- (914) 948-3162 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/ ___