[ATrpms-users] mythweb update warning

2013-10-15 Thread Steve Cliffe
On the weekend I updated my MythTV server and for the most part it picked up 0.26.1-296 versions of the various myth packages but mythweb updated to 0.27. This broke a few things (blank upcoming recordings, no thumbnails for recorded programs) and I found this thread which describes the

Re: [ATrpms-users] new myth rev 292.1 mythmetadatalookup problem

2013-06-19 Thread Steve Cliffe
And again in 0.26.0-294.el6.x86_64 Steve. On 1/06/2013 10:06 PM, OM Ugarcina wrote: Hello Axel and Guys , I have just upgraded to myth 292.1 on el6 64 bit and our metadata lookup problem that has returned again . After installing some video files , I have noticed that mythmetadatalookup is

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV 0.26 on ATrpms

2013-05-20 Thread Steve Cliffe
I had been holding off for this and was getting to the stage where I was contemplating building it from source and installing so this is good to hear. Steve. On 20/05/2013 11:25 PM, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, Just upgraded to 0.26 yesterday build from atrpms, from 0.25 (old atrpms build) on

Re: [ATrpms-users] SUCCESS -- MythTv-0.25_rc156 upgrade from 0.24 worked on i686 and x86_64 -- SUCCESS

2012-04-25 Thread Steve Cliffe
Hi Bob, Just wanted to say thanks for this. I've just upgraded from 0.24 to 0.25 on my CentOS 6.2 x86_64 box following your instructions and it worked perfectly. It was the smoothest MythTV upgrade I can recall. Steve. PS. Thanks also to Axel for providing the packages! On 14/04/2012 11:59

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythtv segmentation faults - the mystery deepens

2012-04-19 Thread Steve Cliffe
That is certainly a strange problem, and I'd be tempted to think that a file is somehow getting corrupted. Maybe you could do a clean install of the rpms, wait for a day and the problem to occur and then run something like find /usr -mtime -1 to see if any of the installed files have been

Re: [ATrpms-users] lirc-0.8.7 Kernel Module for latest RHEL 6.2 kernel

2012-02-12 Thread Steve Cliffe
On a related topic I'm running lirc-0.9.0 noticed that there is no lirc-kmdl for the latest kernel (2.6.32-220.4.1). I upgraded a couple of weeks ago but am forced to run the older 2.6.32-220.2.1 due to the lack of the lirc kernel module. Steve. On 13/02/2012 6:29 AM, James B. Huber wrote:

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythfrontend Zombies Segfaults

2012-01-12 Thread Steve Cliffe
I don't do much, so whilst it is a pain it would be nice to have a fix. Happy to help with further diagnosis if anyone has any suggestions. Steve. On 12/01/2012 5:08 PM, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 1/9/2012 4:47 AM, Steve Cliffe wrote: Hi Kirk, I'm one of those that have been experiencing

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythfrontend Zombies Segfaults

2012-01-12 Thread Steve Cliffe
On 13/01/2012 2:21 PM, James Szinger wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:58:23 -0800 Kirk Bocekt...@kbocek.com wrote: On 1/12/2012 4:22 PM, James Szinger wrote: I'm running mythtv on a CentOS 6.2 system, and it's working well---I haven't noticed any problems. Although, now that I've read this

Re: [ATrpms-users] Mythfrontend Zombies Segfaults

2012-01-09 Thread Steve Cliffe
Hi Kirk, I'm one of those that have been experiencing this problem. I'm planning to update to 6.2 (x86_64) this week and will let you know if it improves/fixes things for me. Steve. On 8/01/2012 2:09 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: Thought I'd try tackling this again in the new year. I've got a new

Re: [ATrpms-users] Zombie Mythfrontend Processes

2011-12-07 Thread Steve Cliffe
On 7/12/2011 7:34 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 12/6/2011 1:14 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:49:45AM -0800, Kirk Bocek wrote: On 12/5/2011 9:23 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:57:54PM -0800, Kirk Bocek wrote: I finally got mythfrontend running on Centos 6

Re: [ATrpms-users] /usr/bin/faad permission

2011-08-23 Thread Steve Cliffe
No, the permissions are not right. I installed this a week or two ago on a CentOS 6 x86_64 box and had to do a chmod 755 /usr/bin/faad. Steve. On 23/08/2011 9:01 PM, huyfuo wrote: I use scientificlinux6 and el6-i386 repo. Permission of /usr/bin/faad is 0644. Is this right? $ rpm -qpi

Re: [ATrpms-users] MythTV Install Issue on Centos6

2011-07-17 Thread Steve Cliffe
I installed MythTV on CentOS 6 yesterday and hit this one too. You need to use the perl-Date-Manip package from ATrpms testing - my install picked it up from the base repo. Steve. On 18/07/2011 2:03 AM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: While trying to yum install mythtv on my

Re: [ATrpms-users] VLC on RHEL6 dependency issue

2011-02-24 Thread Steve Cliffe
On 25/02/2011 10:18 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:17 +1100, Steve Cliffe wrote: Just wondering how far away the lirc libs are as I tried to install VLC today and hit this dependency error. Should be working now, can you confirm? Yep, found it last night - thanks. Steve

Re: [ATrpms-users] VLC on RHEL6 dependency issue

2011-02-17 Thread Steve Cliffe
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:17 -0800, Steve Cleveland wrote: I've just starting working with RHEL6 and trying to get VLC installed using the ATRPMs package, but I'm getting a couple of dependency errors: -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vlc-1.1.5-63.el6.x86_64 (atrpms) Requires:

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc 1.1 dependencies for CentOS 5 - libxcb

2010-07-18 Thread Steve Cliffe
Mark, I hit this problem when I finally got vlc 1.1 installed. After a bit of googling I stumbled upon an environment variable LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK. I added the following to my .gnomerc and it fixed the problem: LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK=1 export LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK I'm not sure

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc 1.1 dependencies for CentOS 5 - libxcb

2010-07-12 Thread Steve Cliffe
. On 12/07/2010 5:58 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 05:37:56PM +1000, Steve Cliffe wrote: I tried (unsuccessfully) to update vlc on the weekend and ran into the following: Error: Missing Dependency: libxcb-keysyms.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package vlc-1.1.0-56.el5.x86_64 (atrpms

Re: [ATrpms-users] vlc 1.1 dependencies for CentOS 5 - libxcb

2010-07-12 Thread Steve Cliffe
Ah - I had repository priorities which were preventing the 1.0 version from base being updated. Thanks Axel, Steve. On 13/07/2010 4:15 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:08:56PM +1000, Steve Cliffe wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Axel. That certainly helped but I'm not quite

Re: [ATrpms-users] Multiple versions of MythTV packages installed

2010-06-30 Thread Steve Cliffe
Thanks for that Axel - I can confirm that it is only the libmyth* packages that are affected. Off to clean up, Steve. On 30/06/2010 6:59 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:47:41PM +1000, Steve Cliffe wrote: I just did my semi-regular monthly yum update (CentOS 5.5 box

[ATrpms-users] Multiple versions of MythTV packages installed

2010-06-29 Thread Steve Cliffe
I just did my semi-regular monthly yum update (CentOS 5.5 box) and whilst checking things noticed that I have multiple versions of mythtv packages installed: [r...@mythpvr steve]# yum list installed | grep libmyth libmyth-0.21_0.x86_64 0.21-213.el5 installed

Re: [ATrpms-users] Jamu on CentOS

2010-02-08 Thread Steve Cliffe
Brian, I've got jamu working on my CentOS 5.4 system but took a slightly different approach. I compiled Python 2.6 from source and installed it in a different location (/packages/python26) to avoid conflicts. I had to add a few extra modules but I don't remember it being too painful. One

Re: [ATrpms-users] Logrotate for mythfilldatabase.log

2010-01-07 Thread Steve Cliffe
I'm using this: /var/log/mythtv/mythbackend.log /var/log/mythtv/mythfilldatabase { copytruncate daily size 10M missingok rotate 3 compress notifempty postrotate kill -HUP `cat /var/run/mythbackend.pid`

Re: [ATrpms-users] mythfilldatabase segmentation faults in logwatch

2010-01-07 Thread Steve Cliffe
/01/2010 8:28 AM, Steve Cliffe wrote: Yep, I see this too: /bin/sh: line 1: 4815 Segmentation fault nice /usr/bin/mythfilldatabase --graboptions '--daily' /var/log/mythtv/mythfilldatabase I was hoping that it would be fixed after I upgraded to 0.22 but it still happens. It's annoying but not so

Re: [ATrpms-users] How to back out of a libgcrypt conflict?

2009-12-04 Thread Steve Cliffe
Chuck, I recall having this problem a few weeks ago when I went to upgrade to 5.4. From memory I removed the old package with rpm --erase --nodeps libgcrypt11, installed the new one then used lsof /usr | grep gcrypt to find out what running processes had the old shared library files open and

Re: [ATrpms-users] video4linux for el5.2?

2008-07-28 Thread Steve Cliffe
John, I upgraded my CentOS x86_64 box from 5.1 to 5.2 over the weekend and found that there was no video4linux kmdl package for the current kernel. In the past I've needed this for the drivers for some video cameras I have hooked up for ZoneMinder (www.zoneminder.com). After a bit of digging

Re: [ATrpms-users] video4linux for el5.2?

2008-07-28 Thread Steve Cliffe
John Robinson wrote: On 28/07/2008 13:25, Steve Cliffe wrote: John, I upgraded my CentOS x86_64 box from 5.1 to 5.2 over the weekend and found that there was no video4linux kmdl package for the current kernel. In the past I've needed this for the drivers for some video cameras I have