[ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-04 Thread Peter J. Duda
Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving the following error: Failed Dependencies: libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 is the library on my system - this shouldn't matter should it? the library is

[ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-14 Thread Peter Duda
Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving the following error: Failed Dependencies: libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 is the library on my system - this shouldn't matter should it? the library i

Re: [ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote: > Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving > the following > > error: Failed Dependencies: >libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . > > But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 i

Re: [ATrpms-users] OpenGroupware RPM

2006-10-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote: >> Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving >> the following >> >> error: Failed Dependencies: >>libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by . >> >> But Pilot Link is already in