Trying to catch-up the discussion...
To: auctex@gnu.org
From: t...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:34:49 +0200
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
[...]
I renamed it `nor' because I think that a user may want to pass
explicitly `(nor
Ok, now I look into Tassilo's feedback on the patch itself...
To: auctex@gnu.org
From: t...@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:49:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo
collision
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
Ok, now it seems that I have caught up, and gone through all the new
messages...
I have attached a new version of the patch to this message taking into
account the previous email, but it does not contain yet any addition to
NEWS/manual.
From: t...@gnu.org
To: m...@gnu.org
CC:
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
Hi Vincent,
BTW, in my previous email I proposed a defun for (not...), but please
note that with this defun `not' must have one single *dialect*
argument (`dialect' as opposed to `dialect expression').
So (nor x y) is equivalent to (not (or x
Vincent Belaïche vincent@hotmail.fr writes:
FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate
info doc update NEWS entry (Vincent, could you please add that?)
Yes, of course, I will do that in the next patch version.
Do that once we have settled on a specific patch
Hello,
Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook
dialect sets.
It saves 43 lines of code in tex.el, and also has a smaller memory
footprint per hooks because an integer is smalled than a list containing
one symbol (best case for the sorted list based implementation).
I
Just to say: do not pay too much attention to the ChangeLog is the patch
attached to my previous mail, as it needs update --- I will do that with
the rests of pending changes (ie NEWS manual).
Vincent.
Hello,
Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook
dialect sets.
