Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> thanks for looking at this. I have one question: Would it make sense to
> move the (executable-find "texdoc") further up in the function body?
Yes, I think that it would make sense well. I honored the following
comment in the former half of the defun, but
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Thus I think that AUCTeX need not collect the output now; it just has to
> look at the exit code. We can use `call-process' (with `executable-find'
> test in case that Texdoc isn't available) to run Texdoc.
thanks for looking at this. I have one question: Would
Great, it works now! It opens the requested file in the viewer and gives an
error message if it does not exist. (Well, it often opens a file even if I give
it a nonsensical string, like "d", which opens the documentation for
baskervaldadf -- but I assume that's a texdoc thing.)
All the
