Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-17 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > Not sure whether the attached bash script may be useful to other > people, I have written it to detect suspicious blanks on all files > that come into a patch, so that if some day I submit some other patch, > the same problem will not occur. Great! > PS:

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-17 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Hello Tassilo, [...] > > Bye, > Tassilo > > BTW: Your patches contained some minor problems in that they introduced > trailing whitespaces and spaces before tabs in indented code. New > versions of Git emit warnings for that that and it was easy to fix them > after applying your patches. But sti

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-14 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, >> Thanks, applied. Could you please also document `TeX-add-style-hook's >> new third argument in the info docs. > > Please find the patch attached. Thanks, applied. > Thank you very much for your support and kind checking & installing my > contribution. W

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-13 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Hello Tassilo, > From: t...@gnu.org > To: vincent@hotmail.fr > CC: auctex@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:26:40 +0200 > > Vincent Bela

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-12 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: > Here you are. Thanks, applied. Could you please also document `TeX-add-style-hook's new third argument in the info docs. Bye, Tassilo ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-12 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Here you are. Vincent. > From: t...@gnu.org > To: vincent@hotmail.fr > CC: auctex@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:18:00 +0200 > > Vincent Belaïche writes: > > Hi

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-12 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook > dialect sets. Nice, I like it. > However I decided to provide separate implementations for nor and not, > as I think that you wish to get rid of `nor', and the `not' specific > implementa

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Just to say: do not pay too much attention to the ChangeLog is the patch attached to my previous mail, as it needs update --- I will do that with the rests of pending changes (ie NEWS & manual). Vincent. >Hello, > >Attached is the other patch --- that with bitmap based style hook >dialect set

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:56:02 +0200 > > Vincent Belaïche writes: > > >> FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate > >> info doc update & NEWS entry (Vince

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: >> FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an appropriate >> info doc update & NEWS entry (Vincent, could you please add that?) > > Yes, of course, I will do that in the next patch version. Do that once we have settled on a specific patch version. > Please m

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > BTW, in my previous email I proposed a defun for (not...), but please > note that with this defun `not' must have one single *dialect* > argument (`dialect' as opposed to `dialect expression'). > > So (nor x y) is equivalent to (not (or x y)) only in the ca

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Vincent Belaïche
: vincent@hotmail.fr; auctex@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:37:03 +0200 > > Mosè Giordano writes: > > > I have only a concern about this patch: we should release a new > > ve

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Ok, now I look into Tassilo's feedback on the patch itself... > To: auctex@gnu.org > From: t...@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:49:26 +0200 > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > > Vincent Belaïche writes: >

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-10 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Trying to catch-up the discussion... > To: auctex@gnu.org > From: t...@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:34:49 +0200 > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > [...] > > > > I renamed it `nor' because I

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-09 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: > I have only a concern about this patch: we should release a new > version of AUCTeX these days, if the plan still holds, I'm not sure we > should apply a not so tested, though valuable, patch before the > release. FWIW, I wouldn't mind releasing with that patch and an app

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-09 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Vincent and Tassilo, 2014-09-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Vincent Belaïche : >> > Concerning this one I did it with taking into account the comments: >> > >> > - handling bibtex case (from Mosè) but I have not tested whether this >> > solves it. Also I used bib-cite.el file which might be not so >> > rel

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-08 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > Please ignore the previous patch attachment: I had not made all the > corresponding updates in the ChangeLog. Ok. Some last nitpicks below. > diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el > index f3316d5..9bbcb29 100644 > --- a/tex.el > +++ b/tex.el > @@ -2376,15 +2376,5

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-08 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: > BTW I could not find the issue tracker at > https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/auctex, are you at all using an > issue tracker (or AUCTeX does not have any issues :-P :-DDD ). We're currently using a plain mailinglist (bug-auc...@gnu.org). That's were bug reports sent

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-08 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Please ignore the previous patch attachment: I had not made all the corresponding updates in the ChangeLog. >Hello Tassilo et alii, > [...] > >Bye, > Vincent. Re-Bye, Vincent. diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 9b70f3a..2318fb7 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,329 @@

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-08 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Hello Tassilo et alii, My updated patch attached. Comment inserted below. > From: t...@gnu.org > To: vincent@hotmail.fr > CC: m...@gnu.org; auctex@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo > collision‏ > Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2

Re: [AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-08 Thread Tassilo Horn
Vincent Belaïche writes: Hi Vincent, > First of all, I must apologize to you Tassilo, I had overlooked your > comment about defalias not supporting docstring for XEmacs, so in my > last contrib (small optimization) that was not corrected. > > Question: shouldn't I provide a small patch only for

[AUCTeX] Problem with latex2e style hook --- LaTeX/Texinfo collision‏

2014-09-06 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Hello, I am back at it. First of all, I must apologize to you Tassilo, I had overlooked your comment about defalias not supporting docstring for XEmacs, so in my last contrib (small optimization) that was not corrected. Question: shouldn't I provide a small patch only for that defalias TeX-assoc